Tools & Wizards About Us
estc.info screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

estc.info

ESTC - EMEA Synthetic Turf Council - the voice of the synthetic turf industry

Page Load Speed

11.5 sec in total

First Response

2.3 sec

Resources Loaded

8.6 sec

Page Rendered

649 ms

estc.info screenshot

About Website

Welcome to estc.info homepage info - get ready to check ESTC best content right away, or after learning these important things about estc.info

ESTC is the industry association for the synthetic turf industry and has the vision to serve as the forum to promote, develop, grow and advocate for the synthetic turf industry.

Visit estc.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Estc.info page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

estc.info performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value30.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,310 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value33.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.estc.info

2271 ms

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

197 ms

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

459 ms

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

699 ms

animations.css

408 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Estc.info, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Estc.info.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (36%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Estc.info main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 100.4 kB

  • Original 125.2 kB
  • After minification 121.6 kB
  • After compression 24.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 88.6 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ESTC images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 529.0 kB

  • Original 760.2 kB
  • After minification 760.2 kB
  • After compression 231.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 529.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 701.3 kB

  • Original 819.5 kB
  • After minification 811.5 kB
  • After compression 118.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Estc.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 701.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (79%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ESTC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.estc.info

www.estc.info

2271 ms

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

197 ms

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

459 ms

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

699 ms

animations.css

animations.css

408 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

387 ms

search-filter.min.css

search-filter.min.css

558 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

413 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

491 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

522 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

688 ms

post-13693.css

post-13693.css

565 ms

e-animation-shrink.min.css

e-animation-shrink.min.css

590 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

622 ms

widget-theme-elements.min.css

widget-theme-elements.min.css

679 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

713 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

690 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

786 ms

apple-webkit.min.css

apple-webkit.min.css

790 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

807 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

805 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

811 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

828 ms

global.css

global.css

976 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

895 ms

fadeInLeft.min.css

fadeInLeft.min.css

904 ms

widget-loop-builder.min.css

widget-loop-builder.min.css

939 ms

fadeInUp.min.css

fadeInUp.min.css

923 ms

fadeIn.min.css

fadeIn.min.css

930 ms

widget-call-to-action.min.css

widget-call-to-action.min.css

1020 ms

widget-posts.min.css

widget-posts.min.css

1032 ms

widget-video.min.css

widget-video.min.css

1030 ms

post-10.css

post-10.css

1075 ms

post-17555.css

post-17555.css

1067 ms

post-17627.css

post-17627.css

1081 ms

css

css

30 ms

js

js

74 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

1046 ms

style.css

style.css

942 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

843 ms

dynamic-visibility.min.css

dynamic-visibility.min.css

786 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

927 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

785 ms

search-filter-build.min.js

search-filter-build.min.js

900 ms

chosen.jquery.min.js

chosen.jquery.min.js

755 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

723 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

767 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

788 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

837 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

731 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

791 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

754 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

784 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

767 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

760 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

689 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

769 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

905 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

765 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

761 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

747 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

675 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

759 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

782 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

748 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

735 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

702 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

799 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

750 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

771 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

756 ms

estc-logo-reverse.svg

estc-logo-reverse.svg

433 ms

green-bg-box.png

green-bg-box.png

425 ms

PEF-2.png

PEF-2.png

527 ms

News-Item-768x384.png

News-Item-768x384.png

771 ms

FIH-award-1-768x384.jpg

FIH-award-1-768x384.jpg

550 ms

TV-video-thumb-768x407.png

TV-video-thumb-768x407.png

919 ms

blue-bg-box.png

blue-bg-box.png

571 ms

ESTO-ST-1-1500x1000-1030x687.jpg

ESTO-ST-1-1500x1000-1030x687.jpg

772 ms

AdobeStock_298571202-environcare-web-1030x686.jpg

AdobeStock_298571202-environcare-web-1030x686.jpg

731 ms

mebers-banner-bg-1030x693.jpg

mebers-banner-bg-1030x693.jpg

858 ms

Yardex-World-Rugby-300x150.jpg

Yardex-World-Rugby-300x150.jpg

679 ms

FIH-award-1-300x150.jpg

FIH-award-1-300x150.jpg

788 ms

News-Item-300x150.png

News-Item-300x150.png

855 ms

NCO-and-ESTC-300x200.png

NCO-and-ESTC-300x200.png

844 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

21 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

28 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

47 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

55 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

56 ms

Rubber-crumb-infill-web-1-300x157.jpg

Rubber-crumb-infill-web-1-300x157.jpg

838 ms

TV-video-thumb-300x159.png

TV-video-thumb-300x159.png

867 ms

Accessibility Review

estc.info accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

estc.info best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

estc.info SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Estc.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Estc.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

estc.info

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ESTC. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: