Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

estetik.ru

Эстетик Клуб - cеть центров косметологии в Санкт-Петербурге

Page Load Speed

7.4 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

507 ms

estetik.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Estetik content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about estetik.ru

Эстетик Клуб – это сеть центров медицинской косметологии в Санкт-Петербурге, оснащенных передовым оборудованием.

Visit estetik.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Estetik.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

estetik.ru performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

estetik.ru

1177 ms

core.css

267 ms

colorbox.css

269 ms

css_99591ccbed79309acfd779e8e4d878c0.css

452 ms

styles.css

444 ms

Our browser made a total of 160 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (114 requests) were addressed to the original Estetik.ru, 5% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (6 requests) were made to Widgets.livetex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Estetik.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 993.9 kB (25%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Estetik.ru main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 362.9 kB

  • Original 414.7 kB
  • After minification 374.9 kB
  • After compression 51.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 362.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 42.9 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Estetik images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 414.0 kB

  • Original 597.3 kB
  • After minification 556.9 kB
  • After compression 183.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 414.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 174.1 kB

  • Original 208.4 kB
  • After minification 179.6 kB
  • After compression 34.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Estetik.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 174.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (36%)

Requests Now

143

After Optimization

92

The browser has sent 143 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Estetik. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

estetik.ru accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

estetik.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

estetik.ru SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Estetik.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Estetik.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Estetik. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: