3.6 sec in total
310 ms
2.6 sec
650 ms
Click here to check amazing Estheticon content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about estheticon.com
Find all information about plastic surgery - reviews, prices, surgeons, before & after pictures, surgery videos, patient stories and more.
Visit estheticon.comWe analyzed Estheticon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 310 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
estheticon.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.191
64/100
15%
Value4.1 s
87/100
10%
310 ms
563 ms
119 ms
102 ms
102 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Estheticon.com, 42% (27 requests) were made to D32dq8khacxhzy.cloudfront.net and 9% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (610 ms) relates to the external source D32dq8khacxhzy.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 690.8 kB (62%)
1.1 MB
416.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Estheticon.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 624.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Estheticon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 410.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 410.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 234.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Estheticon.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 234.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (43%)
56
32
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Estheticon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
estheticon.com
310 ms
www.estheticon.com
563 ms
front.css
119 ms
style.css
102 ms
homepage.css
102 ms
require.js
203 ms
jsapi
95 ms
brand
105 ms
foo.js
89 ms
conversion.js
100 ms
dc.js
189 ms
gpt.js
68 ms
badge_light.png
161 ms
40 ms
all.svg
41 ms
bg.png
40 ms
1.jpg
144 ms
vertical-delimiter.png
41 ms
post-count-arrow.png
155 ms
onepixel.gif
120 ms
771993.jpg
268 ms
749883.jpg
267 ms
736781.jpg
267 ms
610420.jpg
608 ms
647273.jpg
610 ms
688605.jpg
465 ms
EN.svg
277 ms
en.png
270 ms
footer-delimiter.png
276 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
131 ms
geoDoctorsHp.js
283 ms
jquery.js
282 ms
modernizr.js
280 ms
default+en.css
83 ms
default+en.I.js
119 ms
icons.woff
326 ms
768595.jpg
129 ms
inpage_linkid.js
124 ms
ads
346 ms
container.html
225 ms
251 ms
239 ms
__utm.gif
194 ms
foundation.min.js
59 ms
jquery.validate.js
57 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.js
59 ms
geocoder
166 ms
106 ms
107 ms
sessionid.php
471 ms
15705560081174286839
31 ms
5
123 ms
osd.js
28 ms
640006.jpg
130 ms
653390.jpg
217 ms
657869.jpg
262 ms
sessionid.php
223 ms
updatesitemap
401 ms
css
95 ms
jquery.smartbanner.js
13 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
59 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
81 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
124 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
125 ms
estheticon.com accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
estheticon.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
estheticon.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Estheticon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Estheticon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
estheticon.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Estheticon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: