Tools & Wizards About Us
estheticsinmotion.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

estheticsinmotion.com

Arizona Wedding Videography: Esthetics In Motion

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

45 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

292 ms

estheticsinmotion.com screenshot

About Website

Visit estheticsinmotion.com now to see the best up-to-date Esthetics In Motion content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about estheticsinmotion.com

Our passion for wedding videography produces keepsake films to cherish for a lifetime.

Visit estheticsinmotion.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Estheticsinmotion.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

estheticsinmotion.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

79/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,430 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

estheticsinmotion.com

45 ms

estheticsinmotion.com

425 ms

style.min.css

43 ms

go_pricing_styles.css

21 ms

full-styles.6.10.6.css

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Estheticsinmotion.com, 25% (13 requests) were made to Player.vimeo.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (773 ms) relates to the external source Player.vimeo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 98.9 kB (22%)

Content Size

451.4 kB

After Optimization

352.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Estheticsinmotion.com main page is 451.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 242.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 83.6 kB

  • Original 101.7 kB
  • After minification 99.6 kB
  • After compression 18.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 107.7 kB
  • After minification 93.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Esthetics In Motion needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 242.0 kB
  • After minification 242.0 kB
  • After compression 240.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (68%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Esthetics In Motion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

estheticsinmotion.com

estheticsinmotion.com

45 ms

estheticsinmotion.com

estheticsinmotion.com

425 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

43 ms

go_pricing_styles.css

go_pricing_styles.css

21 ms

full-styles.6.10.6.css

full-styles.6.10.6.css

29 ms

mkhb-render.css

mkhb-render.css

27 ms

mkhb-row.css

mkhb-row.css

24 ms

mkhb-column.css

mkhb-column.css

26 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

49 ms

theme-options-production-1719533506.css

theme-options-production-1719533506.css

38 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

40 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

40 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

36 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

62 ms

shortcodes-styles.min.css

shortcodes-styles.min.css

65 ms

webfontloader.js

webfontloader.js

61 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

63 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

63 ms

api.js

api.js

32 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

61 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

338 ms

api.js

api.js

62 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

61 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

62 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

61 ms

e4e568ceaec0e8f48df94cbb3150790c.js

e4e568ceaec0e8f48df94cbb3150790c.js

63 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

66 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

47 ms

esthetics-in-motion-logo1-padded.png

esthetics-in-motion-logo1-padded.png

45 ms

CLU_Horz.png

CLU_Horz.png

86 ms

best_of_zola_2023.png

best_of_zola_2023.png

125 ms

205604247

205604247

325 ms

final-01-229x300.png

final-01-229x300.png

279 ms

as-seen-circle_no_date1000x-pbmasen50gpoghm59nsrrnppbegn3b204aitozo2u4.png

as-seen-circle_no_date1000x-pbmasen50gpoghm59nsrrnppbegn3b204aitozo2u4.png

278 ms

bow_alternate_digitalbadge_2021_500x500-pbmaiquurrhl4rnbohgt53h5iu2tzapbgh564lzqsc.png

bow_alternate_digitalbadge_2021_500x500-pbmaiquurrhl4rnbohgt53h5iu2tzapbgh564lzqsc.png

272 ms

2013BOW_VendorProfile_Gold_382x382-150x150.gif

2013BOW_VendorProfile_Gold_382x382-150x150.gif

268 ms

2011_BOW_gold_web_120x120.gif

2011_BOW_gold_web_120x120.gif

215 ms

970186633

970186633

378 ms

881475300

881475300

326 ms

894308035

894308035

320 ms

226519607

226519607

337 ms

708906171

708906171

304 ms

574261547

574261547

572 ms

194717254

194717254

552 ms

929330408

929330408

526 ms

307164331

307164331

581 ms

247150093

247150093

622 ms

318785090

318785090

651 ms

575595743

575595743

773 ms

collect

collect

48 ms

js

js

73 ms

api.js

api.js

12 ms

Accessibility Review

estheticsinmotion.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

estheticsinmotion.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

estheticsinmotion.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Estheticsinmotion.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Estheticsinmotion.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

estheticsinmotion.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Esthetics In Motion. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: