1.8 sec in total
405 ms
1.2 sec
207 ms
Visit estiques.com now to see the best up-to-date Estiques content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about estiques.com
Visit estiques.comWe analyzed Estiques.com page load time and found that the first response time was 405 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
estiques.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
30%
Value1.065
2/100
15%
Value0
0/100
10%
405 ms
250 ms
171 ms
171 ms
337 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Estiques.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (585 ms) belongs to the original domain Estiques.com.
Page size can be reduced by 355.4 kB (70%)
507.6 kB
152.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Estiques.com main page is 507.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 354.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.4 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Estiques images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 279.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 279.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Estiques.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (61%)
33
13
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Estiques. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
estiques.com
405 ms
tnet.css
250 ms
style.css
171 ms
widgets.css
171 ms
jquery14.js
337 ms
simplemodal.js
255 ms
lang_switch.js
246 ms
widgets.js
254 ms
mt.js
585 ms
mt-more.js
328 ms
sc.js
332 ms
calendar.js
419 ms
site_lang_ru.js
347 ms
lang_switch.js
411 ms
widgets.js
414 ms
calculator.js
259 ms
logo.png
84 ms
bull-grey.png
85 ms
icq.png
85 ms
mail.png
85 ms
chat.png
85 ms
bull-squares.png
85 ms
sprites.png
165 ms
vk.png
166 ms
tw.png
167 ms
fb.png
167 ms
back.png
168 ms
front.png
169 ms
bull-orange.png
246 ms
88x31_wm_v_blue_on_white_ru.png
248 ms
logo_white.png
248 ms
scserver-small.png
250 ms
megastock.png
251 ms
01.png
250 ms
div-login-bg.png
289 ms
estiques.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
estiques.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
estiques.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Estiques.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Estiques.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
estiques.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Estiques. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: