6.3 sec in total
1.6 sec
4.3 sec
454 ms
Click here to check amazing EStratagem content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about estratagem.com
Visit estratagem.comWe analyzed Estratagem.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
estratagem.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value14.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value1,730 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.416
23/100
15%
Value15.0 s
8/100
10%
1578 ms
123 ms
897 ms
159 ms
176 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Estratagem.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Estratagem.com.
Page size can be reduced by 951.0 kB (35%)
2.7 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Estratagem.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EStratagem images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 453.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 453.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 339.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Estratagem.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 339.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (60%)
84
34
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EStratagem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.estratagem.com
1578 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
123 ms
www.estratagem.com
897 ms
styles.css
159 ms
settings.css
176 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
151 ms
style.css
140 ms
blue.css
209 ms
font-awesome.css
193 ms
font-awesome-corp.css
230 ms
font-awesome-ext.css
230 ms
font-awesome-social.css
273 ms
font-awesome-more-ie7.min.css
254 ms
wpgmza_style.css
275 ms
jquery.js
388 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
304 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
385 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
369 ms
form.js
369 ms
core.min.js
383 ms
widget.min.js
463 ms
mouse.min.js
418 ms
slider.min.js
494 ms
button.min.js
496 ms
jquery.form.min.js
512 ms
scripts.js
511 ms
tinynav.js
531 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
555 ms
superfish.js
549 ms
jquery.sticky.js
567 ms
owl.carousel.js
564 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
594 ms
jquery.inview.js
596 ms
nbw-parallax.js
599 ms
pi.init.videoResize.min.js
608 ms
wow.min.js
610 ms
jquery.isotope.js
626 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
544 ms
bootstrap.min.css
531 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
537 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
530 ms
theme-options.css
540 ms
animate.css
552 ms
owl.carousel.css
526 ms
owl.theme.css
505 ms
owl.transitions.css
503 ms
font-awesome.min.css
520 ms
theme-responsive.css
509 ms
bootstrap.min.js
581 ms
theme-options.js
552 ms
jquery.cookies.js
487 ms
main.js
494 ms
panelbg.png
389 ms
eStrat_logo_sm.png
140 ms
bg10.png
384 ms
12.png
386 ms
bg15.png
141 ms
Server_03_black1.png
382 ms
bg6.png
381 ms
131-e14024163089901.png
387 ms
eStrat_logo21.jpg
110 ms
parallax412.jpg
457 ms
53.png
352 ms
Green-Leaf.png
352 ms
23.png
387 ms
brainstorming2.jpg
564 ms
more_vertical.png
392 ms
eStra_Spons_magento.png
404 ms
eStra_Spons_mysql.png
404 ms
eStra_Spons_joomla.png
404 ms
eStra_Spons_drupal.png
538 ms
eStra_Spons_comodo.png
539 ms
eStra_Spons_cisco.png
544 ms
eStra_Spons_php.png
459 ms
eStra_Spons_linux.png
516 ms
eStra_Spons_rubyrails.png
521 ms
eStra_Spons_windows.png
577 ms
eStra_Spons_wordpress.png
568 ms
loading.gif
605 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
33 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
613 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
667 ms
fontawesome-ext-webfont.woff
621 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
459 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
449 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
473 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
499 ms
ui.totop.png
354 ms
estratagem.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
estratagem.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
estratagem.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Estratagem.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Estratagem.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
estratagem.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EStratagem. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: