2.6 sec in total
15 ms
2 sec
512 ms
Welcome to eteam.net homepage info - get ready to check ETEAM best content right away, or after learning these important things about eteam.net
We are a seasoned software development company that converts the complex world of development into an easy-to-understand process.
Visit eteam.netWe analyzed Eteam.net page load time and found that the first response time was 15 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
eteam.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value1,100 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.023
100/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
15 ms
798 ms
262 ms
117 ms
81 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eteam.net, 64% (45 requests) were made to Eteam.io and 6% (4 requests) were made to 2879694.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (798 ms) relates to the external source Eteam.io.
Page size can be reduced by 92.3 kB (16%)
560.2 kB
467.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Eteam.net main page is 560.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 340.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ETEAM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eteam.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (32%)
65
44
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ETEAM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eteam.net
15 ms
www.eteam.io
798 ms
module_67923284846_Eteam_Top_Banner.min.css
262 ms
js
117 ms
layout.min.css
81 ms
eTeam_April2019-style.min.css
304 ms
current.js
82 ms
jquery-1.7.1.js
104 ms
embed.js
73 ms
eTeam_April2019-main.min.js
442 ms
project.js
84 ms
project.js
175 ms
module_9085966711_eTeam_April2019_Theme_Custom_Modules_Home_Banner_Area_-_eTeam_April2019.min.js
253 ms
module_8991186430_Two_Column_With_Right_Image_-_eTeam_April2019.min.js
313 ms
2879694.js
243 ms
index.js
310 ms
3358429.js
80 ms
eb91d215-7240-4775-b4b2-ee348f3b4984.png
185 ms
eteam-ua-1.png
755 ms
banner2.webp
49 ms
banner-mobile2.webp
49 ms
css2
43 ms
mad_reports_5e25519d0d35f1579504029.png
163 ms
preview-main-b077ab83a536add0479be23cd8129b5db3e3b5ce03521714d513378c54af4399.jpg
97 ms
apple-56449e274cc9cd70d2e07ab85115bb3dfc25ff16602c5ba3d24150aed3e45940.svg
96 ms
google-a33a47a20c0ec6b0c13af43ae681bf73023e4a35f792cb055700e94d467f236d.svg
97 ms
walmart-0895d520c0a18697e6e86c59c3affde1e54b6ddcf481ae204ad5dbe9688f4852.svg
90 ms
pwc-logo-png-transparent.png
285 ms
gamestop-668e9f500275f29e132ea586f80288a8e2f2388b93d6fde35f08e9336556aca5.svg
144 ms
BlueSnap.png
162 ms
kissmetrics-logo.png
272 ms
best-buy-64cd48a1fe6c744ea40d10733b69b7eaae21779712b600e65129220040a03e1c.svg
164 ms
Logo.png
203 ms
bitcoin.com.png
202 ms
acceptto.png
203 ms
Marley-Spoon.png
271 ms
payithere-41c864ca2c64320fe09358d730d5852586dd4ca7df3ba80848c7d61d738a391e.jpg
287 ms
Armatic-1.png
349 ms
Genie.png
301 ms
aws-badge.svg
288 ms
logo-eteam-monolight.svg
324 ms
icon-linkedin%201.svg
322 ms
icon-facebook%201.svg
587 ms
icon-twitter%201.svg
345 ms
clutch-b2b-2023.png
683 ms
clutch-champ-2023.png
399 ms
youteam-d8206d0618d24454768ff609b04f9d2a202f1bea8cd50da401a24e9fe32abd16.png
380 ms
badge-1.png
418 ms
top-app-development-companies%201.png
614 ms
top-software-development-companies-worldwide.png
434 ms
bc6c9591-1c0e-4e3e-878a-969af6ad4f82.png
160 ms
icon-play.svg
197 ms
223323378
319 ms
icon-by-c53e767105447cee10580e555f3fc8cd99fd12e89eded74a0dbf37b6887b3350.svg
443 ms
icon-for-43df47588bd7b20b27a4ed77814457e0cae7c683362242140b43aae9913f0a6c.svg
462 ms
icon-ent-2724abce4d01022eae7daabd9ddfef3b98d26a029aa02f1ecc9ce5017bba9db3.svg
485 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCM.woff
154 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCM.woff
190 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCM.woff
214 ms
icon-us-a3ab9e76aaf7e060c26803b09e5b9ee22dec2da14501211827b6ec5dc386ee49.svg
183 ms
icon-ua-138820a20c787c499703bf903a259887e396744f41cc4d5c5ee58df6d64d9ea3.svg
179 ms
icon-mexico.svg
492 ms
fb.js
126 ms
2879694.js
159 ms
collectedforms.js
122 ms
leadflows.js
101 ms
2879694.js
137 ms
conversations-embed.js
122 ms
banner.js
164 ms
642442288-f869d931491cc78871b83477637568bf4b2232f3509cb27cbad1e4774daf837b-d
50 ms
eteam.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
eteam.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
eteam.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eteam.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eteam.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eteam.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ETEAM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: