3.4 sec in total
83 ms
2.8 sec
467 ms
Welcome to eteam.net homepage info - get ready to check ETEAM best content right away, or after learning these important things about eteam.net
We are a seasoned software development company that converts the complex world of development into an easy-to-understand process.
Visit eteam.netWe analyzed Eteam.net page load time and found that the first response time was 83 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
eteam.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value240 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
83 ms
211 ms
70 ms
236 ms
97 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Eteam.net, 6% (4 requests) were made to 2879694.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source I.vimeocdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 257.5 kB (30%)
850.2 kB
592.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Eteam.net main page is 850.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 502.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ETEAM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 66 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 190.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eteam.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 190.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (31%)
61
42
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ETEAM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.eteam.io
83 ms
module_67923284846_Eteam_Top_Banner.min.css
211 ms
layout.min.css
70 ms
eTeam_April2019-style.min.css
236 ms
current.js
97 ms
jquery-1.7.1.js
58 ms
eTeam_April2019-main.min.js
434 ms
project.js
71 ms
project.js
83 ms
module_9085966711_eTeam_April2019_Theme_Custom_Modules_Home_Banner_Area_-_eTeam_April2019.min.js
260 ms
module_8991186430_Two_Column_With_Right_Image_-_eTeam_April2019.min.js
287 ms
2879694.js
201 ms
index.js
260 ms
eb91d215-7240-4775-b4b2-ee348f3b4984.png
97 ms
eteam-ua-1.png
54 ms
css
75 ms
bc6c9591-1c0e-4e3e-878a-969af6ad4f82.png
120 ms
top-web-developers.png
174 ms
mad_reports_5e25519d0d35f1579504029.png
277 ms
preview-main-b077ab83a536add0479be23cd8129b5db3e3b5ce03521714d513378c54af4399.jpg
119 ms
apple-56449e274cc9cd70d2e07ab85115bb3dfc25ff16602c5ba3d24150aed3e45940.svg
90 ms
google-a33a47a20c0ec6b0c13af43ae681bf73023e4a35f792cb055700e94d467f236d.svg
92 ms
walmart-0895d520c0a18697e6e86c59c3affde1e54b6ddcf481ae204ad5dbe9688f4852.svg
85 ms
pwc-logo-png-transparent.png
116 ms
gamestop-668e9f500275f29e132ea586f80288a8e2f2388b93d6fde35f08e9336556aca5.svg
273 ms
BlueSnap.png
272 ms
kissmetrics-logo.png
174 ms
best-buy-64cd48a1fe6c744ea40d10733b69b7eaae21779712b600e65129220040a03e1c.svg
290 ms
Logo.png
284 ms
bitcoin.com.png
171 ms
acceptto.png
222 ms
Marley-Spoon.png
273 ms
payithere-41c864ca2c64320fe09358d730d5852586dd4ca7df3ba80848c7d61d738a391e.jpg
523 ms
Armatic-1.png
759 ms
Genie.png
350 ms
aws-badge.svg
448 ms
logo-footer.png
755 ms
icon-linkedin%201.svg
463 ms
icon-facebook%201.svg
378 ms
icon-twitter%201.svg
446 ms
clutch.png
764 ms
youteam-d8206d0618d24454768ff609b04f9d2a202f1bea8cd50da401a24e9fe32abd16.png
766 ms
top-app-development-companies%201.png
808 ms
top-software-development-companies-worldwide.png
754 ms
icon-play.svg
222 ms
223323378
377 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
209 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
243 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
275 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
290 ms
icon-by-c53e767105447cee10580e555f3fc8cd99fd12e89eded74a0dbf37b6887b3350.svg
662 ms
icon-for-43df47588bd7b20b27a4ed77814457e0cae7c683362242140b43aae9913f0a6c.svg
652 ms
icon-ent-2724abce4d01022eae7daabd9ddfef3b98d26a029aa02f1ecc9ce5017bba9db3.svg
654 ms
icon-us-a3ab9e76aaf7e060c26803b09e5b9ee22dec2da14501211827b6ec5dc386ee49.svg
288 ms
icon-ua-138820a20c787c499703bf903a259887e396744f41cc4d5c5ee58df6d64d9ea3.svg
207 ms
icon-mexico.svg
346 ms
leadflows.js
137 ms
collectedforms.js
107 ms
2879694.js
173 ms
2879694.js
229 ms
fb.js
123 ms
642442288-f869d931491cc78871b83477637568bf4b2232f3509cb27cbad1e4774daf837b-d.jpg
266 ms
player.js
52 ms
player.css
263 ms
vuid.min.js
263 ms
642442288-f869d931491cc78871b83477637568bf4b2232f3509cb27cbad1e4774daf837b-d
1549 ms
eteam.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
eteam.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
eteam.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eteam.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eteam.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eteam.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ETEAM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: