Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

855 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

60 ms

ethandsmith.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ethandsmith.com homepage info - get ready to check Ethandsmith best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ethandsmith.com

Visit ethandsmith.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ethandsmith.com page load time and found that the first response time was 855 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ethandsmith.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ethandsmith.com

855 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ethandsmith.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (855 ms) belongs to the original domain Ethandsmith.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 396.0 kB (59%)

Content Size

676.7 kB

After Optimization

280.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Ethandsmith.com main page is 676.7 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 366.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 10 B

  • Original 113 B
  • After minification 113 B
  • After compression 103 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 154.6 kB
  • After minification 146.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ethandsmith images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 82.9 kB

  • Original 155.2 kB
  • After minification 155.2 kB
  • After compression 72.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 82.9 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 305.5 kB

  • Original 366.8 kB
  • After minification 337.1 kB
  • After compression 61.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ethandsmith.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 305.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

ethandsmith.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

ethandsmith.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

ethandsmith.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ethandsmith.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ethandsmith.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ethandsmith. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: