Tools & Wizards About Us
etrigg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

etrigg.com

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

227 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

118 ms

etrigg.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Etrigg content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about etrigg.com

etrigg.com is the fastest and easiest event discovery platform available - find any kind of events nearby or while on the go.

Visit etrigg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Etrigg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

etrigg.com performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.313

37/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

etrigg.com

227 ms

etrigg.com

494 ms

e.css

195 ms

adsbygoogle.js

32 ms

e.js

393 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Etrigg.com, 19% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 15% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (494 ms) belongs to the original domain Etrigg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 204.0 kB (57%)

Content Size

359.4 kB

After Optimization

155.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Etrigg.com main page is 359.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 206.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 21.2 kB

  • Original 26.1 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 283 B

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Etrigg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 81.4 kB

  • Original 206.6 kB
  • After minification 206.5 kB
  • After compression 125.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 81.4 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 101.1 kB

  • Original 122.7 kB
  • After minification 122.3 kB
  • After compression 21.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Etrigg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 101.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (41%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Etrigg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

etrigg.com

etrigg.com

227 ms

etrigg.com

etrigg.com

494 ms

e.css

e.css

195 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

32 ms

e.js

e.js

393 ms

js

js

96 ms

ca-pub-4475506129405263.js

ca-pub-4475506129405263.js

9 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

25 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

47 ms

favicon-32x32.png

favicon-32x32.png

208 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

464 ms

ads

ads

170 ms

osd.js

osd.js

2 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

29 ms

125 ms

228 ms

collect

collect

19 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

31 ms

abg.js

abg.js

46 ms

collect

collect

77 ms

favicon

favicon

46 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

42 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

29 ms

s

s

21 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

13 ms

E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js

E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js

3 ms

Accessibility Review

etrigg.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

etrigg.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

etrigg.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Etrigg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Etrigg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

etrigg.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Etrigg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: