2.4 sec in total
125 ms
2.1 sec
151 ms
Welcome to etrm.energytechreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Etrm Energy Tech Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about etrm.energytechreview.com
Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...
Visit etrm.energytechreview.comWe analyzed Etrm.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
etrm.energytechreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
48/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value1,890 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.243
51/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
125 ms
668 ms
328 ms
279 ms
279 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Etrm.energytechreview.com, 51% (44 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (730 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 91.9 kB (8%)
1.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Etrm.energytechreview.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 600.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Etrm Energy Tech Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Etrm.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (61%)
76
30
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Etrm Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
etrm.energytechreview.com
125 ms
etrm.energytechreview.com
668 ms
bootstrap.css
328 ms
font-awesome.min.css
279 ms
animate.css
279 ms
owl.carousel.css
282 ms
owl.theme.default.css
282 ms
normalize.css
284 ms
slicknav.min.css
340 ms
style1.css
121 ms
main.css
367 ms
responsive.css
345 ms
modernizr-3.5.0.min.js
348 ms
css
54 ms
css
86 ms
css
98 ms
js
95 ms
gpt.js
132 ms
adsbygoogle.js
162 ms
element.js
85 ms
new_region.css
350 ms
style.css
126 ms
jQuery.verticalCarousel.css
140 ms
jquery.min.js
47 ms
jQuery.verticalCarousel.js
182 ms
jquery.flipbox.css
184 ms
cube_slider.css
185 ms
jquery.flipbox.js
188 ms
jquery-3.3.1.slim.min.js
52 ms
jquery.min.js
577 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
468 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
467 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
468 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
468 ms
main.js
575 ms
smart-sticky.js
576 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
575 ms
jquery_cookie.js
575 ms
custom.js
575 ms
jquery.easy-ticker.js
730 ms
analytics.js
236 ms
gpt.js
389 ms
atrk.js
126 ms
Final-Logo.png
232 ms
load.gif
387 ms
450x308_zad9.webp
388 ms
450x308_5MS4.webp
387 ms
jrdm2Untitled-4.jpg
417 ms
bctzo400.jpg
416 ms
q4ol0300.jpg
478 ms
595k3300.jpg
477 ms
450x308_7R0M.jpg
416 ms
450x308_lqdD.jpg
413 ms
450x308_Y0rO.webp
477 ms
alpd8Solutioarawrf.jpg
478 ms
9fn02Servicerank.jpg
477 ms
450x308_Ut2H.webp
476 ms
450x308_26Gr.jpg
613 ms
450x308_EzcB.jpg
541 ms
x.png
540 ms
linkedin_cirr.png
229 ms
pubads_impl.js
163 ms
show_ads_impl.js
516 ms
zrt_lookup_nohtml.html
195 ms
jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zI.ttf
191 ms
jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q14.ttf
209 ms
jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q14.ttf
224 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
185 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
312 ms
collect
165 ms
css
100 ms
font-awesome.min.css
109 ms
ads
163 ms
container.html
77 ms
js
61 ms
450x308_zad9.webp
88 ms
450x308_5MS4.webp
89 ms
450x308_Ut2H.webp
75 ms
icon-up.png
73 ms
1261171924365000533
182 ms
icon.png
184 ms
abg_lite.js
181 ms
window_focus.js
182 ms
ufs_web_display.js
69 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
254 ms
ads
90 ms
etrm.energytechreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
etrm.energytechreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
etrm.energytechreview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Etrm.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Etrm.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
etrm.energytechreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Etrm Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: