Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

euroq.eu

Qualitätsdienstleistungen für die Automobilindustrie | EuroQ

Page Load Speed

10.9 sec in total

First Response

949 ms

Resources Loaded

9.2 sec

Page Rendered

785 ms

euroq.eu screenshot

About Website

Visit euroq.eu now to see the best up-to-date EuroQ content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about euroq.eu

Qualitätsdienstleistungen für Hersteller & Zulieferer der Automobilindustrie. Umfangreiche Services ✓ Internationale Qualitätsstandards ✓

Visit euroq.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Euroq.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 949 ms and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

euroq.eu performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,470 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

euroq.eu

949 ms

style.min.css

261 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

338 ms

theme.1.css

518 ms

timeme.min.js

338 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Euroq.eu, 5% (2 requests) were made to Code.etracker.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Etracker.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Euroq.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 235.1 kB (32%)

Content Size

745.2 kB

After Optimization

510.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Euroq.eu main page is 745.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 488.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 194.1 kB

  • Original 222.9 kB
  • After minification 205.0 kB
  • After compression 28.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 194.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 40.7 kB

  • Original 488.4 kB
  • After minification 447.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EuroQ images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 274 B

  • Original 33.9 kB
  • After minification 33.9 kB
  • After compression 33.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (45%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EuroQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

euroq.eu accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

euroq.eu best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

euroq.eu SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Euroq.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Euroq.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EuroQ. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: