Tools & Wizards About Us
evamark.lt screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

evamark.lt

Ieva Markevičiūtė: Profesionalus vestuvių fotografas

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

83 ms

evamark.lt screenshot

About Website

Visit evamark.lt now to see the best up-to-date Evamark content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about evamark.lt

Esu vestuvių fotografė Ieva, kurianti jaukius, šiltus ir romantiškus prisiminimus. Fotografuoju visoje Lietuvoje ir užsienyje.

Visit evamark.lt

Key Findings

We analyzed Evamark.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

evamark.lt performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.evamark.lt

1374 ms

css

42 ms

css

60 ms

css

28 ms

wpb-custom-bootstrap.css

149 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Evamark.lt, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Evamark.lt.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 76.6 kB (10%)

Content Size

801.6 kB

After Optimization

725.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Evamark.lt main page is 801.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 537.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 30.2 kB

  • Original 38.3 kB
  • After minification 37.6 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 537.4 kB
  • After minification 535.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Evamark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 19.7 kB

  • Original 156.4 kB
  • After minification 156.4 kB
  • After compression 136.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.7 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 69.5 kB
  • After minification 52.1 kB
  • After compression 44.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Evamark.lt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (87%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Evamark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.evamark.lt

www.evamark.lt

1374 ms

css

css

42 ms

css

css

60 ms

css

css

28 ms

wpb-custom-bootstrap.css

wpb-custom-bootstrap.css

149 ms

main.css

main.css

241 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

255 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

245 ms

hover-effects.css

hover-effects.css

253 ms

styles.css

styles.css

266 ms

global.css

global.css

286 ms

grid.css

grid.css

360 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

363 ms

style.css

style.css

499 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

383 ms

fluxus-customize.css

fluxus-customize.css

420 ms

user.css

user.css

481 ms

mpc-styles.css

mpc-styles.css

608 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

629 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

541 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

554 ms

jscripts.php

jscripts.php

620 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

660 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

680 ms

jquery.tinyscrollbar.js

jquery.tinyscrollbar.js

691 ms

jquery.sharrre.js

jquery.sharrre.js

732 ms

jquery.transit.js

jquery.transit.js

747 ms

helpers.js

helpers.js

751 ms

utils.js

utils.js

762 ms

jquery.fluxus-grid.js

jquery.fluxus-grid.js

817 ms

jquery.reveal.js

jquery.reveal.js

826 ms

jquery.fluxus-lightbox.js

jquery.fluxus-lightbox.js

852 ms

iscroll.js

iscroll.js

872 ms

jquery.fluxus-slider.js

jquery.fluxus-slider.js

874 ms

burger-menu.js

burger-menu.js

890 ms

fastclick.js

fastclick.js

956 ms

main.js

main.js

961 ms

user.js

user.js

969 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1000 ms

mpc-vendor.min.js

mpc-vendor.min.js

861 ms

mpc-scripts.min.js

mpc-scripts.min.js

789 ms

jscripts-ftr-min.js

jscripts-ftr-min.js

853 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

844 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

837 ms

evamark.png

evamark.png

494 ms

evamark-retina.png

evamark-retina.png

592 ms

RG-399-1-1920x1030.jpg

RG-399-1-1920x1030.jpg

1431 ms

slash.png

slash.png

569 ms

Arcon-Regular.woff

Arcon-Regular.woff

707 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

698 ms

Accessibility Review

evamark.lt accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

evamark.lt best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

evamark.lt SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    LT

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Evamark.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Lithuanian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Evamark.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

evamark.lt

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Evamark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: