6.9 sec in total
1.7 sec
5.1 sec
195 ms
Visit evamark.lt now to see the best up-to-date Evamark content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about evamark.lt
Esu vestuvių fotografė Ieva, kurianti jaukius, šiltus ir romantiškus prisiminimus. Fotografuoju visoje Lietuvoje ir užsienyje.
Visit evamark.ltWe analyzed Evamark.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
evamark.lt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value10.8 s
0/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.5 s
24/100
10%
1669 ms
51 ms
84 ms
31 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Evamark.lt, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Evamark.lt.
Page size can be reduced by 61.9 kB (7%)
832.0 kB
770.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Evamark.lt main page is 832.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 592.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Evamark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Evamark.lt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (87%)
47
6
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Evamark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.evamark.lt
1669 ms
css
51 ms
css
84 ms
css
31 ms
wpb-custom-bootstrap.css
156 ms
main.css
243 ms
font-awesome.min.css
245 ms
magnific-popup.css
241 ms
hover-effects.css
238 ms
styles.css
250 ms
global.css
264 ms
grid.css
357 ms
fontello.css
361 ms
style.css
471 ms
responsive.css
372 ms
fluxus-customize.css
391 ms
user.css
486 ms
mpc-styles.css
609 ms
jquery.js
634 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
508 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
521 ms
jscripts.php
605 ms
scripts.js
685 ms
underscore.min.js
708 ms
jquery.tinyscrollbar.js
715 ms
jquery.sharrre.js
730 ms
jquery.transit.js
730 ms
helpers.js
732 ms
utils.js
734 ms
jquery.fluxus-grid.js
766 ms
jquery.reveal.js
767 ms
jquery.fluxus-lightbox.js
853 ms
iscroll.js
862 ms
jquery.fluxus-slider.js
863 ms
burger-menu.js
864 ms
fastclick.js
894 ms
main.js
893 ms
user.js
976 ms
comment-reply.min.js
991 ms
mpc-vendor.min.js
845 ms
mpc-scripts.min.js
862 ms
jscripts-ftr-min.js
787 ms
wp-embed.min.js
787 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1009 ms
evamark.png
585 ms
evamark-retina.png
586 ms
RG-399-1-1920x1030.jpg
1142 ms
slash.png
586 ms
Arcon-Regular.woff
554 ms
fontello.woff
632 ms
evamark.lt accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
evamark.lt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
evamark.lt SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
LT
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Evamark.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Lithuanian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Evamark.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
evamark.lt
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Evamark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: