Tools & Wizards About Us
evansandhorton.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

evansandhorton.com

Home - Evans & Horton Roofing, L.P

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

126 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

431 ms

evansandhorton.com screenshot

About Website

Visit evansandhorton.com now to see the best up-to-date Evans And Horton content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about evansandhorton.com

Evans & Horton Roofing Satisfaction Guaranteed By choosing Evans & Horton Roofing as your contractor, you can feel confident that your job will be a priority and we will do all we can to provide you w...

Visit evansandhorton.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Evansandhorton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

evansandhorton.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value27.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,570 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

evansandhorton.com

126 ms

evansandhorton.com

1788 ms

flaticon.css

103 ms

style.min.css

158 ms

styles.css

161 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Evansandhorton.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Evansandhorton.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (24%)

Content Size

12.5 MB

After Optimization

9.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Evansandhorton.com main page is 12.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 11.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 216.3 kB

  • Original 255.1 kB
  • After minification 251.0 kB
  • After compression 38.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 216.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 2.6 MB

  • Original 11.4 MB
  • After minification 8.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Evans And Horton needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.6 MB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 57.7 kB

  • Original 374.1 kB
  • After minification 374.1 kB
  • After compression 316.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.7 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 130.6 kB

  • Original 450.4 kB
  • After minification 450.4 kB
  • After compression 319.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Evansandhorton.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.6 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (85%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Evans And Horton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

evansandhorton.com

evansandhorton.com

126 ms

evansandhorton.com

evansandhorton.com

1788 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

103 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

158 ms

styles.css

styles.css

161 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

167 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

165 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

215 ms

perfect-scrollbar.min.css

perfect-scrollbar.min.css

164 ms

chrisbracco-tooltip.min.css

chrisbracco-tooltip.min.css

218 ms

multi-columns-row.css

multi-columns-row.css

212 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

220 ms

flexslider.min.css

flexslider.min.css

223 ms

tm-boldman-icons.css

tm-boldman-icons.css

223 ms

slick.css

slick.css

267 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

273 ms

prettyPhoto.min.css

prettyPhoto.min.css

274 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

286 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

281 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

286 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

321 ms

global.css

global.css

326 ms

post-228.css

post-228.css

327 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

340 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

339 ms

js_composer_tta.min.css

js_composer_tta.min.css

396 ms

base.min.css

base.min.css

425 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

436 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

484 ms

servicebox-animation.min.css

servicebox-animation.min.css

397 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

387 ms

css

css

32 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

448 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

446 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

523 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

504 ms

jquery-resize.min.js

jquery-resize.min.js

504 ms

js

js

24 ms

css

css

18 ms

css

css

27 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

467 ms

index.js

index.js

414 ms

index.js

index.js

426 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

425 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

547 ms

perfect-scrollbar.jquery.min.js

perfect-scrollbar.jquery.min.js

422 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

420 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

417 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

413 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

412 ms

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

412 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

406 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

465 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

422 ms

numinate.min.js

numinate.min.js

437 ms

circle-progress.min.js

circle-progress.min.js

436 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

426 ms

functions.min.js

functions.min.js

442 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

444 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

457 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

451 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

450 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

438 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

446 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

396 ms

loader.js

loader.js

190 ms

Screen-Shot-2023-02-15-at-1.39.24-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2023-02-15-at-1.39.24-PM.png

459 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

374 ms

Screen-Shot-2023-02-20-at-2.47.31-PM-600x700.png

Screen-Shot-2023-02-20-at-2.47.31-PM-600x700.png

458 ms

Screen-Shot-2023-02-22-at-2.12.59-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2023-02-22-at-2.12.59-PM.png

593 ms

Screen-Shot-2023-02-20-at-11.36.42-AM.png

Screen-Shot-2023-02-20-at-11.36.42-AM.png

485 ms

Screen-Shot-2023-02-22-at-2.14.44-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2023-02-22-at-2.14.44-PM.png

596 ms

Screen-Shot-2023-02-22-at-1.56.29-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2023-02-22-at-1.56.29-PM.png

693 ms

Screen-Shot-2023-02-15-at-3.04.26-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2023-02-15-at-3.04.26-PM.png

425 ms

tm-boldman-icons.woff

tm-boldman-icons.woff

454 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

482 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

61 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

87 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

102 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

102 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

103 ms

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcABrE.ttf

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcABrE.ttf

63 ms

undefined

undefined

640 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

177 ms

Accessibility Review

evansandhorton.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

evansandhorton.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

evansandhorton.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Evansandhorton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Evansandhorton.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

evansandhorton.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Evans And Horton. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: