Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

evcompare.io

Green Cars Compare: USA Electric Vehicle Hub (ex. EV Compare)

Page Load Speed

791 ms in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

424 ms

Page Rendered

337 ms

evcompare.io screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing EV Compare content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about evcompare.io

USA electric car knowledge base. Compare specs and prices. Tips and tricks, incentives map, charging calculator. Go electric with confidence!

Visit evcompare.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Evcompare.io page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 761 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

evcompare.io performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

evcompare.io

30 ms

greencarscompare.com

139 ms

greencarscompare.com

225 ms

core.min.js

23 ms

kernel_main_v1.js

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Evcompare.io, 85% (17 requests) were made to Greencarscompare.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (225 ms) relates to the external source Greencarscompare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 113.2 kB (44%)

Content Size

254.8 kB

After Optimization

141.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Evcompare.io main page is 254.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 131.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 93.5 kB

  • Original 123.2 kB
  • After minification 122.5 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 19.6 kB

  • Original 131.6 kB
  • After minification 131.6 kB
  • After compression 112.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.6 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (64%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EV Compare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

evcompare.io accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

evcompare.io best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

evcompare.io SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Evcompare.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Evcompare.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EV Compare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: