7.2 sec in total
1.5 sec
5.3 sec
360 ms
Click here to check amazing Evedex content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about evedex.net
Infiintare Firme Offshore, Delaware, Seychelles, Belize, St.Vincent Deschideri conturi bancare offshore carduri de debit anonime Firma Offshore
Visit evedex.netWe analyzed Evedex.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
evedex.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value9.4 s
1/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.16
73/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
1511 ms
223 ms
340 ms
23 ms
340 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Evedex.net, 25% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Evedex.net.
Page size can be reduced by 192.6 kB (15%)
1.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Evedex.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 938.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 127.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Evedex needs image optimization as it can save up to 127.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Evedex.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (57%)
51
22
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Evedex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
evedex.net
1511 ms
style.css
223 ms
responsive.css
340 ms
css
23 ms
style.min.css
340 ms
classic-themes.min.css
355 ms
cleantalk-public.min.css
329 ms
css
84 ms
jquery.min.js
476 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
594 ms
apbct-public-bundle.min.js
594 ms
mylivechat.css
592 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
709 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
13 ms
camera.js
595 ms
jquery-func.js
603 ms
jquery.easing.js
789 ms
component.js
789 ms
bootstrap.min.js
787 ms
livehelp_js.php
1788 ms
chatinline.aspx
182 ms
navigation.js
710 ms
counter.js
292 ms
bootstrap.css
628 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
705 ms
fontello.css
824 ms
camera.css
706 ms
css
25 ms
livechat2.aspx
332 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
121 ms
glyphicons-halflings.png
1128 ms
logo.png
345 ms
bottom_shadow.png
131 ms
contact_ro.jpg
361 ms
li-check.png
177 ms
silver.jpg
242 ms
arrow.png
292 ms
gold.jpg
361 ms
platinum.jpg
408 ms
art8768234.jpg
463 ms
banner_75.jpg
481 ms
art876823477tyy.jpg
596 ms
delaware-offshore.jpg
521 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
29 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
11 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
26 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
28 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
54 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
28 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
27 ms
fontello.svg
773 ms
fontello.woff
778 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf
63 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
27 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
27 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
27 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf
64 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
28 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf
28 ms
bull.jpg
148 ms
ga.js
30 ms
arrow_large_left.png
124 ms
arrow_large_right.png
151 ms
camera-loader.gif
181 ms
slide1_ro.jpg
535 ms
css
23 ms
chatinline.css
33 ms
resources2.aspx
130 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
6 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
7 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
7 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
66 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
66 ms
livechatinit2.js
32 ms
slide2_ro.jpg
237 ms
evedex.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<object> elements do not have alternate text
evedex.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
evedex.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document uses plugins
RO
RO
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Evedex.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Romanian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Evedex.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
evedex.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Evedex. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: