Tools & Wizards About Us
evergreenchoice.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

evergreenchoice.com

In Home Senior Care | In Home Elderly Care New York | EvergreenChoice

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

562 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

554 ms

evergreenchoice.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Evergreen Choice content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about evergreenchoice.com

New York's Leading In Home Care Services for Seniors. Specializing in Hospice Care, Alzheimers Care, Companion Care & Senior Care Services.

Visit evergreenchoice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Evergreenchoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 562 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

evergreenchoice.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

evergreenchoice.com

562 ms

analytics.js

62 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

78 ms

validationEngine.jquery.css

117 ms

style.min.css

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Evergreenchoice.com, 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (585 ms) belongs to the original domain Evergreenchoice.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 47.4 kB (1%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Evergreenchoice.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 25.7 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Evergreen Choice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 148.9 kB
  • After minification 148.9 kB
  • After compression 138.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 101.2 kB
  • After minification 100.6 kB
  • After compression 90.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Evergreenchoice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (66%)

Requests Now

94

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Evergreen Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

evergreenchoice.com

evergreenchoice.com

562 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

62 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

78 ms

validationEngine.jquery.css

validationEngine.jquery.css

117 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

118 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

124 ms

css

css

49 ms

styles.css

styles.css

122 ms

common.css

common.css

125 ms

editor_form.css

editor_form.css

131 ms

formcraft.css

formcraft.css

177 ms

tp_twitter_plugin.css

tp_twitter_plugin.css

169 ms

settings.css

settings.css

173 ms

css

css

47 ms

mobile.nav.frontend.css

mobile.nav.frontend.css

180 ms

js_composer.css

js_composer.css

175 ms

css

css

46 ms

css

css

51 ms

css

css

46 ms

css

css

46 ms

css

css

47 ms

css

css

47 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

348 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

228 ms

custom-new3.css

custom-new3.css

377 ms

media.min.css

media.min.css

229 ms

royalslider.css

royalslider.css

235 ms

style.css

style.css

239 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

373 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

285 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

451 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

296 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

373 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

516 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

532 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

538 ms

svg-icons.min.js

svg-icons.min.js

536 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

542 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

544 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

539 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

541 ms

jquery.transit.min.js

jquery.transit.min.js

541 ms

jquery.touchwipe.min.js

jquery.touchwipe.min.js

539 ms

mobile.nav.frontend-ck.js

mobile.nav.frontend-ck.js

540 ms

collect

collect

49 ms

jquery.royalslider.js

jquery.royalslider.js

515 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

487 ms

desktop-tablet.min.js

desktop-tablet.min.js

462 ms

desktop.min.js

desktop.min.js

453 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

450 ms

js_composer_front.js

js_composer_front.js

465 ms

combined-js.js

combined-js.js

471 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

467 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

473 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

469 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

466 ms

form.js

form.js

465 ms

form_only.js

form_only.js

464 ms

jquery.fileupload.min.js

jquery.fileupload.min.js

458 ms

jquery.iframe-transport.min.js

jquery.iframe-transport.min.js

509 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

508 ms

jquery.validationEngine.js

jquery.validationEngine.js

504 ms

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

501 ms

dt-contact-form.js

dt-contact-form.js

456 ms

new3.general-boxed-bg-image.jpg

new3.general-boxed-bg-image.jpg

196 ms

Senior-Care-NYC-reg.png

Senior-Care-NYC-reg.png

167 ms

prosform.jpg

prosform.jpg

272 ms

Non-Medical-Homecare-for-Your-Loved-Ones-Should-You-Consider-It.jpg

Non-Medical-Homecare-for-Your-Loved-Ones-Should-You-Consider-It.jpg

268 ms

alzheimers-mid-stage-e1415896086126.jpg

alzheimers-mid-stage-e1415896086126.jpg

585 ms

newslogosSlider.png

newslogosSlider.png

428 ms

SmEGCLogo.jpg

SmEGCLogo.jpg

165 ms

text.php

text.php

166 ms

nutrition.jpg

nutrition.jpg

419 ms

senior-groups-a1.jpg

senior-groups-a1.jpg

269 ms

massage.jpg

massage.jpg

417 ms

ParkAssS.png

ParkAssS.png

267 ms

AmericanHeartS.png

AmericanHeartS.png

340 ms

ParkActionS.png

ParkActionS.png

341 ms

APDAS.png

APDAS.png

417 ms

NatStrokeS.png

NatStrokeS.png

422 ms

ParkAllS.png

ParkAllS.png

422 ms

CTsmall.png

CTsmall.png

423 ms

alzfdnSmall.png

alzfdnSmall.png

425 ms

NCCNsmall.png

NCCNsmall.png

504 ms

supportSmall.png

supportSmall.png

505 ms

shutterstock_254980588-60x60.jpg

shutterstock_254980588-60x60.jpg

506 ms

shutterstock_294489461-60x60.jpg

shutterstock_294489461-60x60.jpg

506 ms

shutterstock_80373409-copy-60x60.jpg

shutterstock_80373409-copy-60x60.jpg

506 ms

Hip-Fracture-60x60.jpg

Hip-Fracture-60x60.jpg

506 ms

logo-Mobile.png

logo-Mobile.png

504 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

98 ms

greenbggg.jpg

greenbggg.jpg

427 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

48 ms

css

css

45 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

300 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

307 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

73 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

76 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

73 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

75 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

98 ms

arrow_left.png

arrow_left.png

96 ms

arrow_right.png

arrow_right.png

96 ms

SEO Factors

evergreenchoice.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Evergreenchoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Evergreenchoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

evergreenchoice.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Evergreen Choice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: