Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

everlane.com

Everlane

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

275 ms

everlane.com screenshot

About Website

Visit everlane.com now to see the best up-to-date Everlane content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about everlane.com

Shop Everlane now for modern essentials. We make the most beautiful essentials, at the best factories, without traditional markups. Free shipping on 2+ items.

Visit everlane.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Everlane.com page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

everlane.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.3 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,840 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.373

28/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

everlane.com

165 ms

www.everlane.com

225 ms

desktop-d27ad5e3ddc1ff24ee8955deeb1258bb7c4eb00a8aaf665c02d9793e16cb7c53.css

83 ms

tracker.js

73 ms

config-6e774e4c484879651f5ec8bf1a75f50d4f4a2667340e97ed237398f818ca797c.js

120 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Everlane.com, 16% (16 requests) were made to Everlane-2.imgix.net and 14% (14 requests) were made to Everlane.imgix.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (692 ms) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (61%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Everlane.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 159.4 kB

  • Original 183.3 kB
  • After minification 177.5 kB
  • After compression 24.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 159.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 738.5 kB
  • After minification 735.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Everlane images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 1.7 MB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB
  • After compression 594.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 450.0 kB

  • Original 565.2 kB
  • After minification 560.4 kB
  • After compression 115.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Everlane.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 450.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (51%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

44

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Everlane. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

everlane.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

everlane.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

everlane.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Everlane.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Everlane.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Everlane. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: