36.3 sec in total
1.7 sec
11.8 sec
22.7 sec
Visit eversky.org now to see the best up-to-date Eversky content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eversky.org
Read writing from Mikki Phan on Medium. She lives her life aiming to keep her eyes on the stars, and her feet on the ground.
Visit eversky.orgWe analyzed Eversky.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 34.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
eversky.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value4,460 ms
0/100
30%
Value1
2/100
15%
Value15.5 s
7/100
10%
1728 ms
654 ms
651 ms
643 ms
640 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Eversky.org, 9% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Eversky.org.
Page size can be reduced by 280.2 kB (66%)
422.3 kB
142.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Eversky.org main page is 422.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 244.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eversky images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 146.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 146.1 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eversky.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (88%)
34
4
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eversky. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.eversky.org
1728 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
654 ms
style.css
651 ms
original.css
643 ms
widget.css
640 ms
simple-payments.css
877 ms
css
1314 ms
jetpack.css
875 ms
jquery.js
1143 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1141 ms
wp-google-analytics.js
1141 ms
audio-player.js
1140 ms
cufon-yui.js
1170 ms
vera.font.js
1169 ms
menu.js
3678 ms
photon.js
3678 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
2774 ms
gprofiles.js
1169 ms
wpgroho.js
3677 ms
wp-embed.min.js
4172 ms
e-201736.js
3622 ms
content_top.png
1952 ms
nav.png
1916 ms
searchbox.png
1481 ms
content_middle.png
1482 ms
date_comm_box.png
1915 ms
tags_category.png
1943 ms
older_newer.png
899 ms
sidebar_h3.png
819 ms
arrow.gif
819 ms
ga.js
32 ms
content_bottom.png
246 ms
__utm.gif
42 ms
hovercard.css
16 ms
services.css
84 ms
eversky.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
ARIA tooltip elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eversky.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
eversky.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eversky.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eversky.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eversky.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eversky. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: