22.6 sec in total
7.9 sec
14.4 sec
377 ms
Visit evibrant.com now to see the best up-to-date Evibrant content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about evibrant.com
Lead Services
Visit evibrant.comWe analyzed Evibrant.com page load time and found that the first response time was 7.9 sec and then it took 14.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
evibrant.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value4.8 s
68/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
7885 ms
665 ms
441 ms
721 ms
704 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Evibrant.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Evibrant.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (49%)
3.4 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Evibrant.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Evibrant images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 971.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 610.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Evibrant.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 610.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (78%)
87
19
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Evibrant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.evibrant.com
7885 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
665 ms
styles.css
441 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
721 ms
jquery-ui-spinner.css
704 ms
calendar-jos.css
684 ms
form_maker_frontend.css
684 ms
rokbox.css
644 ms
roksocialbuttons.css
885 ms
dashicons.min.css
1176 ms
thickbox.css
874 ms
showcase.css
862 ms
headlines.css
1011 ms
tabs.css
1011 ms
strips.css
1094 ms
grid-responsive.css
1103 ms
bootstrap.css
1165 ms
master-f5b7ca345b1b2a35a8eebb58b539bc25.css
2037 ms
master-webkit.css
1590 ms
demo-f5b7ca345b1b2a35a8eebb58b539bc25.css
2312 ms
mediaqueries.css
2075 ms
menu.css
2073 ms
style.css
1253 ms
mootools.js
2560 ms
jquery.js
2762 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2357 ms
js
35 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js
2383 ms
jelly.min.js
2444 ms
file-upload.js
2688 ms
calendar.js
2686 ms
calendar_function.js
2687 ms
main_div_front_end.js
2696 ms
rokbox.js
2676 ms
addthis_widget.js
21 ms
mootools-mobile.js
2871 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
2874 ms
roksprocket.js
2872 ms
moofx.js
2967 ms
features.js
2444 ms
showcase.js
2308 ms
headlines.js
2312 ms
tabs.js
2306 ms
roksprocket.request.js
2284 ms
strips.js
2282 ms
strips-speeds.js
2335 ms
chart.js
2255 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
2240 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
2358 ms
sidemenu.js
2176 ms
gantry-totop.js
2091 ms
rokajaxsearch.js
2115 ms
jquery.form.min.js
2120 ms
scripts.js
2053 ms
widget.min.js
2086 ms
core.min.js
2035 ms
mouse.min.js
1756 ms
slider.min.js
1301 ms
button.min.js
1285 ms
spinner.min.js
1283 ms
effect.min.js
1037 ms
effect-shake.min.js
1026 ms
thickbox.js
1081 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1198 ms
ga.js
15 ms
img1.jpg
622 ms
img-showcase.jpg
915 ms
noise.png
335 ms
logo.png
334 ms
img2.jpg
620 ms
img1.jpg
621 ms
img2.jpg
620 ms
img3.jpg
593 ms
img4.jpg
335 ms
quicksand-regular-webfont.woff
331 ms
quicksand-bold-webfont.woff
610 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
568 ms
jDi1CAeUgvU
65 ms
bOcpD1B3wUA
77 ms
www-embed-player-vfl8xM8me.css
23 ms
www-embed-player.js
40 ms
base.js
66 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
55 ms
ad_status.js
54 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
53 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
53 ms
300lo.json
33 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
1257 ms
sh.07f0d9bf220d07a763adad1e.html
57 ms
evibrant.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
evibrant.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
evibrant.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Evibrant.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Evibrant.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
evibrant.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Evibrant. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: