6 sec in total
801 ms
4.9 sec
286 ms
Click here to check amazing E Web S content for Greece. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ewebs.gr
Creating modern websites, developing your projects since 2003. Developing on Joomla and Wordpress. Web development
Visit ewebs.grWe analyzed Ewebs.gr page load time and found that the first response time was 801 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
ewebs.gr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value14.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
801 ms
538 ms
181 ms
183 ms
178 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ewebs.gr, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Kwarks.gr.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (83%)
2.6 MB
434.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ewebs.gr main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, E Web S needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 89% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 590.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 590.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 386.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ewebs.gr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 386.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (88%)
60
7
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Web S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ewebs-kwarks
801 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.bootstrap.less.css
538 ms
style.css
181 ms
system.css
183 ms
plugins.system.t3.base-bs3.less.legacy-grid.less.css
178 ms
font-awesome.css
270 ms
plugins.system.t3.base-bs3.less.t3.less.css
182 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.core.less.css
266 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.typography.less.css
266 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.forms.less.css
357 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.navigation.less.css
271 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.navbar.less.css
353 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.modules.less.css
445 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.joomla.less.css
447 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.components.less.css
358 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.style.less.css
527 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.ajax.less.css
451 ms
plugins.system.t3.base-bs3.less.megamenu.less.css
542 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.megamenu.less.css
544 ms
plugins.system.t3.base-bs3.less.off-canvas.less.css
622 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.off-canvas.less.css
701 ms
font-awesome.min.css
703 ms
css
24 ms
css
34 ms
css
44 ms
css
44 ms
css
45 ms
css
46 ms
templates.ja_mono.acm.clients.less.style.less.css
613 ms
templates.ja_mono.acm.cta.less.style.less.css
616 ms
templates.ja_mono.acm.features-intro.less.style.less.css
617 ms
templates.ja_mono.acm.teams.less.style.less.css
703 ms
templates.ja_mono.less.layouts.docs.less.css
704 ms
bootstrap.min.css
883 ms
mootools-core.js
959 ms
core.js
784 ms
mootools-more.js
1057 ms
jquery.min.js
970 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
794 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
871 ms
caption.js
721 ms
bootstrap.js
974 ms
system.css
806 ms
jquery.tap.min.js
850 ms
off-canvas.js
797 ms
script.js
865 ms
menu.js
863 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
986 ms
isotope.pkgd.js
972 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
805 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
804 ms
script.js
714 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.js
786 ms
infinitive-paging.js
798 ms
html5fallback.js
803 ms
analytics.js
120 ms
logo.png
96 ms
bg-1.jpg
2237 ms
ico-search.png
96 ms
3nZS3BKzlvhkwl4yjCQcjPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
23 ms
azR40LUJrT4HaWK28zHmVA.woff
23 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
23 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
24 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
22 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
92 ms
collect
19 ms
ewebs.gr accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ewebs.gr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ewebs.gr SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ewebs.gr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ewebs.gr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ewebs.gr
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E Web S. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: