1.7 sec in total
6 ms
1.4 sec
239 ms
Visit examfeedback.com now to see the best up-to-date EXAMFEEDBACK content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about examfeedback.com
A unique opportunity to acquire EXAMFEEDBACK.COM
Visit examfeedback.comWe analyzed Examfeedback.com page load time and found that the first response time was 6 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
examfeedback.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.077
95/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
6 ms
573 ms
23 ms
147 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Examfeedback.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (573 ms) relates to the external source Enaming.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (66%)
1.6 MB
546.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Examfeedback.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 897.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, EXAMFEEDBACK needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 589.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 589.1 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 346.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Examfeedback.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 346.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (81%)
58
11
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EXAMFEEDBACK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
6 ms
573 ms
style.css
23 ms
jquery.min.js
147 ms
style.css
41 ms
style-ribbons.css
42 ms
ParaAdmin.css
56 ms
style.css
54 ms
cache.skin.css
82 ms
mp-stacks-style.css
79 ms
lightbox.css
79 ms
styles.css
77 ms
bootstrap.min.css
85 ms
styles.css
81 ms
jquery.accordion.css
84 ms
tmm_custom_style.min.css
90 ms
css
141 ms
icomoon.css
88 ms
font-awesome.css
88 ms
font-awesome.min.css
101 ms
default.min.css
101 ms
jquery.js
110 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
105 ms
scripts.js
105 ms
jquery.tablednd.js
104 ms
jquery.dragtable.js
108 ms
jscolor.js
109 ms
ParaAdmin.js
111 ms
scripts.js
111 ms
jquery.accordion.js
111 ms
easy-columns.css
110 ms
frontend.css
109 ms
frontend.js
109 ms
addthis_widget.js
112 ms
output.css
112 ms
jquery.form.min.js
111 ms
elementQuery.min.js
111 ms
lightbox.js
111 ms
mp-stacks-front-end.js
111 ms
scripts.js
111 ms
api.js
125 ms
reset.css
111 ms
wp.css
110 ms
post-content.css
93 ms
menu_functions.js
92 ms
wp-embed.min.js
88 ms
functions.js
85 ms
ga.js
250 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
223 ms
analytics.js
380 ms
logo-enaming.png
138 ms
image-page-header.jpg
142 ms
8fd0aa836412853f9fd25e4cd662b1b4.jpg
139 ms
493 ms
sprite.png
111 ms
recaptcha__en.js
344 ms
ajax-loader.gif
229 ms
LAQwev4hdCtYkOYX4Oc7nPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
277 ms
UDfD6oxBaBnmFJwQ7XAFNw.ttf
378 ms
_dCzxpXzIS3sL-gdJWAP8A.ttf
378 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
225 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
226 ms
icomoon.svg
262 ms
__utm.gif
55 ms
collect
121 ms
examfeedback.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
examfeedback.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
examfeedback.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Examfeedback.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Examfeedback.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
examfeedback.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EXAMFEEDBACK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: