Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

examiningtuskegee.com

Examining Tuskegee: The Infamous Syphilis Study and its Legacy by Susan M. Reverby

Page Load Speed

323 ms in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

120 ms

Page Rendered

157 ms

examiningtuskegee.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to examiningtuskegee.com homepage info - get ready to check Examining Tuskegee best content right away, or after learning these important things about examiningtuskegee.com

Examining Tuskegee: The Infamous Syphilis Study and its Legacy, by Susan M. Reverby, is a comprehensive analysis of the notorious study of untreated syphilis, which took place in and around Tuskegee, ...

Visit examiningtuskegee.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Examiningtuskegee.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 277 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

examiningtuskegee.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

examiningtuskegee.com

46 ms

reverby_defaultstyles.css

30 ms

bookcover_examiningTuskegee_2.jpg

42 ms

btn_unc.gif

16 ms

btn_amazon.gif

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Examiningtuskegee.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (46 ms) belongs to the original domain Examiningtuskegee.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.7 kB (14%)

Content Size

39.2 kB

After Optimization

33.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Examiningtuskegee.com main page is 39.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 27.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 8.1 kB
  • After minification 7.5 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 60% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 27.4 kB
  • After minification 27.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Examining Tuskegee images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 851 B

  • Original 3.7 kB
  • After minification 3.7 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Examiningtuskegee.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 851 B or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Examining Tuskegee. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

examiningtuskegee.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

examiningtuskegee.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

examiningtuskegee.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Examiningtuskegee.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Examiningtuskegee.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Examining Tuskegee. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: