4.5 sec in total
419 ms
3.7 sec
362 ms
Click here to check amazing Exartic content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about exartic.co.uk
The Exartic Ltd specializes in the production of high quality Industrial electronic component parts for the automotive and other industries.
Visit exartic.co.ukWe analyzed Exartic.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 419 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
exartic.co.uk performance score
419 ms
107 ms
201 ms
39 ms
266 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Exartic.co.uk, 15% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (720 ms) belongs to the original domain Exartic.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 152.9 kB (23%)
671.4 kB
518.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Exartic.co.uk main page is 671.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 239.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 151.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Exartic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exartic.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (57%)
65
28
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exartic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
exartic.co.uk
419 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
107 ms
layerslider.css
201 ms
css
39 ms
style.min.css
266 ms
styles.css
264 ms
js_composer.css
294 ms
css
50 ms
main.min.css
368 ms
font-awesome.min.css
279 ms
fontello.css
309 ms
main-72e1b23f51.css
387 ms
custom-72e1b23f51.css
482 ms
media-72e1b23f51.css
389 ms
style.css
391 ms
ultimate.min.css
415 ms
Defaults.css
464 ms
jquery-1.12.4-wp.js
508 ms
jquery-migrate-1.4.1-wp.js
518 ms
layerslider.utils.js
520 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
545 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
566 ms
sharethis.js
24 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
577 ms
ultimate.min.js
612 ms
scripts.js
597 ms
api.js
45 ms
script.js
590 ms
main.min.js
720 ms
wp-embed.min.js
674 ms
js_composer_front.js
674 ms
lazyload.min.js
699 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
35 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
51 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
52 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
56 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
56 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
55 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
menu_devider.jpg
121 ms
new-banner01.jpg
321 ms
new-banner5.jpg
321 ms
new-banner2.jpg
453 ms
new-banner6.jpg
321 ms
new-banner3.jpg
323 ms
new-banner4.jpg
453 ms
new-banner7.jpg
504 ms
Roboto-Bold-webfont.woff
440 ms
Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff
439 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
9 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
9 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
9 ms
collect
14 ms
js
262 ms
service_list.png
338 ms
Roboto-Light-webfont.woff
366 ms
footer_hd_line.jpg
345 ms
recaptcha__en.js
218 ms
refill
457 ms
logo.png
201 ms
logo-small.png
201 ms
36597843_l-80x80.jpg
303 ms
10636667_l-80x80.jpg
303 ms
11379289_l-1-80x80.jpg
303 ms
ajax-loader.gif
307 ms
Pneumatic-img.jpg
295 ms
Hydraulic-img.jpg
341 ms
Electrical-Power-img.jpg
344 ms
Power-Transmission-img.jpg
362 ms
Repair-services-img.jpg
365 ms
Airtac-img.jpg
373 ms
anchor
43 ms
styles__ltr.css
13 ms
recaptcha__en.js
18 ms
sLPIoIr_9R2H1vFE63bCW9_RmUPMbLk-XyKwDAco0G4.js
35 ms
webworker.js
75 ms
logo_48.png
23 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
36 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
36 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
35 ms
recaptcha__en.js
32 ms
exartic.co.uk SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exartic.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exartic.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exartic.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Exartic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: