Tools & Wizards About Us
excelwaterjet.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

excelwaterjet.com

Waterjet Cutting Chennai, Water Jet Cutting Job Work In Chennai

Page Load Speed

9.2 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

7.1 sec

Page Rendered

391 ms

excelwaterjet.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to excelwaterjet.com homepage info - get ready to check Excel Waterjet best content right away, or after learning these important things about excelwaterjet.com

Excel Water Jet Cutting Is One Of The Best Waterjet Cutting In Chennai, Water Jet Cutting Job Work In Chennai, Waterjet Cutting, Call To:9600030986.

Visit excelwaterjet.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Excelwaterjet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

excelwaterjet.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.468

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

excelwaterjet.com

1643 ms

font-awesome.css

32 ms

prettyPhoto.css

460 ms

owl.carousel.css

35 ms

animate.css

466 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Excelwaterjet.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Excelwaterjet.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (39%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Excelwaterjet.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 72.4 kB

  • Original 81.6 kB
  • After minification 55.7 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 25.9 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Excel Waterjet needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 40% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 144.4 kB
  • After minification 144.4 kB
  • After compression 138.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 61.9 kB
  • After minification 61.9 kB
  • After compression 54.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Excelwaterjet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (37%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

51

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Excel Waterjet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

excelwaterjet.com

excelwaterjet.com

1643 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

32 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

460 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

35 ms

animate.css

animate.css

466 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

754 ms

settings.css

settings.css

499 ms

style.css

style.css

502 ms

homefitness.css

homefitness.css

690 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

38 ms

styles.php

styles.php

781 ms

quickcms.css

quickcms.css

741 ms

quickcmswidgets.css

quickcmswidgets.css

748 ms

64315ead686f81680957101logo.png

64315ead686f81680957101logo.png

896 ms

1680957057130191.jpg

1680957057130191.jpg

1156 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

763 ms

1680957057234892.jpg

1680957057234892.jpg

1251 ms

168095705740833.jpg

168095705740833.jpg

1246 ms

168095705784734.jpg

168095705784734.jpg

1257 ms

2.png

2.png

677 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1258 ms

3.png

3.png

903 ms

01.png

01.png

1351 ms

2.png

2.png

1389 ms

3.png

3.png

1497 ms

4.png

4.png

1508 ms

5.png

5.png

1716 ms

6.png

6.png

1733 ms

7.png

7.png

1802 ms

8.png

8.png

1846 ms

01.png

01.png

1734 ms

2.png

2.png

1748 ms

3.png

3.png

1948 ms

4.png

4.png

1973 ms

5.png

5.png

1973 ms

6.png

6.png

1990 ms

7.png

7.png

2028 ms

8.png

8.png

2074 ms

9.png

9.png

2178 ms

16887121009eb60bc8bf2b004e4db7d1cc0d5f1d8c.png

16887121009eb60bc8bf2b004e4db7d1cc0d5f1d8c.png

2905 ms

1688712102586e508f161f26ce94633729ac56c602.png

1688712102586e508f161f26ce94633729ac56c602.png

2671 ms

16887121027afbb1602613ec52b265d7a54ad27330.png

16887121027afbb1602613ec52b265d7a54ad27330.png

3130 ms

css

css

18 ms

css

css

30 ms

css

css

33 ms

1688712103602e8f042f463dc47ebfdf6a94ed5a6d.png

1688712103602e8f042f463dc47ebfdf6a94ed5a6d.png

2639 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

12 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

15 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2122 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

2184 ms

retina.js

retina.js

2282 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

2386 ms

wow.js

wow.js

2496 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

2496 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

13 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

2477 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

2398 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

2384 ms

portfolio.js

portfolio.js

2260 ms

main.js

main.js

2237 ms

owl-main.js

owl-main.js

2137 ms

script.js

script.js

2159 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

2064 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

2159 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2477 ms

336976241_HelveticaNeue.ttf

336976241_HelveticaNeue.ttf

2183 ms

336976241_OpenSans-Regular.ttf

336976241_OpenSans-Regular.ttf

2438 ms

336976241_Georgia.ttf

336976241_Georgia.ttf

2324 ms

16887121039eb9cd58b9ea5e04c890326b5c1f471f.png

16887121039eb9cd58b9ea5e04c890326b5c1f471f.png

2143 ms

1688712104f19c9085129709ee14d013be869df69b.png

1688712104f19c9085129709ee14d013be869df69b.png

2351 ms

16887121058266e4bfeda1bd42d8f9794eb4ea0a13.png

16887121058266e4bfeda1bd42d8f9794eb4ea0a13.png

2649 ms

168871210509dd8c2662b96ce14928333f055c5580.png

168871210509dd8c2662b96ce14928333f055c5580.png

2525 ms

168871210610fb15c77258a991b0028080a64fb42d.png

168871210610fb15c77258a991b0028080a64fb42d.png

2502 ms

1688712106fb5c81ed3a220004b71069645f112867.png

1688712106fb5c81ed3a220004b71069645f112867.png

2715 ms

168871210159b2900aa03cb2182a51cdb520b535b6.png

168871210159b2900aa03cb2182a51cdb520b535b6.png

2748 ms

16887121074a47a0db6e60853dedfcfdf08a5ca249.png

16887121074a47a0db6e60853dedfcfdf08a5ca249.png

2339 ms

1.png

1.png

2548 ms

2.png

2.png

2529 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

3456 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

3218 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

2405 ms

9.png

9.png

2810 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

3048 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

2944 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

2971 ms

timer.png

timer.png

1995 ms

revicons90c6.woff

revicons90c6.woff

2156 ms

slider_hr.png

slider_hr.png

2220 ms

Accessibility Review

excelwaterjet.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

excelwaterjet.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

excelwaterjet.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Excelwaterjet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Excelwaterjet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

excelwaterjet.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Excel Waterjet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: