8.5 sec in total
1.1 sec
6.2 sec
1.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Exelium content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about exelium.fr
Vous souhaitez investir dans l'immobilier ? Réduction d'impôts ou constitution de votre patrimoine, Exelium vous conseille
Visit exelium.frWe analyzed Exelium.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
exelium.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value1,060 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.102
89/100
15%
Value12.6 s
14/100
10%
1101 ms
317 ms
395 ms
475 ms
625 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Exelium.fr, 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Exelium.fr.
Page size can be reduced by 105.1 kB (9%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Exelium.fr main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 748.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 103.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Exelium images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 232 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 925 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exelium.fr has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (77%)
52
12
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exelium. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
exelium.fr
1101 ms
frontend.css
317 ms
style.min.css
395 ms
theme.min.css
475 ms
jet-elements.css
625 ms
jet-elements-skin.css
555 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
646 ms
frontend.min.css
721 ms
swiper.min.css
641 ms
post-901.css
638 ms
frontend.min.css
743 ms
post-6.css
710 ms
post-20.css
727 ms
post-58.css
725 ms
css
45 ms
fontawesome.min.css
801 ms
solid.min.css
786 ms
regular.min.css
796 ms
brands.min.css
797 ms
js
37 ms
js
87 ms
animations.min.css
898 ms
jquery.min.js
923 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
923 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
923 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
922 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
922 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
922 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1017 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1077 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1017 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1017 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1017 ms
hooks.min.js
1016 ms
i18n.min.js
1080 ms
frontend.min.js
1081 ms
waypoints.min.js
1083 ms
core.min.js
1081 ms
frontend.min.js
1081 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1157 ms
jet-elements.min.js
913 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
833 ms
analytics.js
193 ms
1-scaled.jpg
575 ms
2-scaled.jpg
570 ms
3-scaled.jpg
640 ms
4-1-scaled.jpg
544 ms
bg-engagements.jpg
624 ms
Logo-noir-en-long.png
472 ms
bg-investissement.jpg
628 ms
bg-footer.jpg
698 ms
Nunito-Regular.woff
504 ms
Nunito-Regular.ttf
4150 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
634 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
561 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
659 ms
Italianno-Regular.woff
592 ms
eicons.woff
784 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
51 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff
52 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff
81 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff
102 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff
103 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff
103 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
104 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff
102 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff
102 ms
Montserrat-Regular.woff
717 ms
collect
57 ms
Refonte-logo-variante-1-q2tn0roiq50fujil5kv11aspdn9klay7dez6vuv400.png
611 ms
exelium.fr accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
exelium.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
exelium.fr SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exelium.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exelium.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exelium.fr
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Exelium. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: