5.9 sec in total
335 ms
5.1 sec
430 ms
Welcome to exept.de homepage info - get ready to check EXept best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about exept.de
Automatisierte Softwaretests, Testen einzelner Technologien oder komplexer, vernetzter Systeme. eXept bietet Tools und Services rund um Testautomatisierung
Visit exept.deWe analyzed Exept.de page load time and found that the first response time was 335 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
exept.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.7 s
0/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value15.6 s
0/100
10%
Value3,380 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.2
62/100
15%
Value18.5 s
3/100
10%
335 ms
253 ms
65 ms
161 ms
307 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Exept.de, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Exept.de.
Page size can be reduced by 329.3 kB (9%)
3.5 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Exept.de main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EXept images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 154.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 154.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exept.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (44%)
79
44
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EXept. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
exept.de
335 ms
253 ms
css
65 ms
jcemediabox.css
161 ms
style.css
307 ms
bootstrap.min.css
446 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
339 ms
bootstrap-extended.css
341 ms
system.css
347 ms
basics.css
351 ms
flexslider.css
458 ms
superfish.css
488 ms
template.css
489 ms
jquery.min.js
709 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
583 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
595 ms
caption.js
626 ms
jcemediabox.js
745 ms
bootstrap.min.js
721 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
743 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
767 ms
html5fallback.js
797 ms
functions.js
853 ms
crawler.js
865 ms
jquery.min.js
44 ms
hoverIntent.js
887 ms
superfish.js
894 ms
393 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
86 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
113 ms
en.gif
148 ms
de.gif
150 ms
logo.png
146 ms
active.png
159 ms
icone-expecco.png
150 ms
icone-expecco-alm.png
159 ms
popup.html
256 ms
tooltip.html
259 ms
testautomatisierung.jpg
1296 ms
slide-7-in-1.jpg
1163 ms
maximale-wiederverwendbarkeit.jpg
1601 ms
slide-qualitaetsmanagement.jpg
1393 ms
teaser_bg.png
415 ms
expecco-zahnraeder.png
510 ms
arrow.png
581 ms
konfigurator.png
949 ms
news-icon-squer.png
733 ms
expecco-mobile.jpg
1182 ms
video-icon-squer.png
1094 ms
projektbeispiel-flugsicherheit.jpg
1337 ms
connected-car.png
1421 ms
qualitaetsmanagement-expeccoalm.png
1331 ms
entwicklung-smalltalk-x.png
1443 ms
swisscom.png
1483 ms
etas.png
1484 ms
t-mobile.png
1537 ms
elo.png
1564 ms
bosch.png
1588 ms
hermes.png
1629 ms
deutsche-telekom.png
1626 ms
sarasin.png
1674 ms
eurocopter.png
1703 ms
daimler.png
1737 ms
kroll.png
1741 ms
abb.png
1769 ms
ubs.png
1773 ms
cassidian.png
1752 ms
brose.png
1780 ms
siemens.png
1807 ms
zeiss.png
1797 ms
dimoco.png
1830 ms
visteon.png
1826 ms
csc.png
1739 ms
eads.png
1781 ms
pbb.png
1626 ms
airbus.png
1538 ms
moovel.png
1500 ms
alcatel-lucent.png
1343 ms
ansprechpartner-tina.png
1200 ms
arrow-transparent.png
1076 ms
buttonarrow.png
1030 ms
slidearrow_left.png
1016 ms
slidearrow_right.png
941 ms
exept.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
exept.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
exept.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exept.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exept.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exept.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EXept. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: