Tools & Wizards About Us
exilva.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

exilva.com

Cellulose fibrils - Borregaard

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

285 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

596 ms

exilva.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Exilva content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about exilva.com

Sustainable Microfibrillated Cellulose (MFC) that improves rheology and stability and provides strength and barrier properties.

Visit exilva.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Exilva.com page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

exilva.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.202

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

exilva.com

285 ms

629 ms

main.min.css

170 ms

file-icon-square-o.min.css

46 ms

live-hotfix-last-in-head.css

375 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Exilva.com, 29% (14 requests) were made to Borregaard.com and 27% (13 requests) were made to Mzp-cdn-brgweb.azureedge.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (876 ms) relates to the external source Video.borregaard.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 132.0 kB (19%)

Content Size

701.5 kB

After Optimization

569.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Exilva.com main page is 701.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 342.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 83.5 kB

  • Original 94.6 kB
  • After minification 61.1 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 33.5 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 902 B

  • Original 208.9 kB
  • After minification 208.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Exilva images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 29.5 kB

  • Original 342.6 kB
  • After minification 342.6 kB
  • After compression 313.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 55.3 kB
  • After minification 55.0 kB
  • After compression 37.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exilva.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (50%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exilva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

exilva.com

exilva.com

285 ms

629 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

170 ms

file-icon-square-o.min.css

file-icon-square-o.min.css

46 ms

live-hotfix-last-in-head.css

live-hotfix-last-in-head.css

375 ms

temp_borregaard_logo.svg

temp_borregaard_logo.svg

445 ms

player.html

player.html

602 ms

v2.js

v2.js

46 ms

2044808.js

2044808.js

109 ms

uMarketingSuite.analytics.js

uMarketingSuite.analytics.js

443 ms

v2.js

v2.js

68 ms

api.js

api.js

50 ms

main.compiled.min.js

main.compiled.min.js

591 ms

omk_0627.jpg

omk_0627.jpg

443 ms

omk_0627.jpg

omk_0627.jpg

265 ms

nicolas-tourrenc-spruce-chips.jpg

nicolas-tourrenc-spruce-chips.jpg

442 ms

istock-1190659544.jpg

istock-1190659544.jpg

599 ms

istock-1024259724.jpg

istock-1024259724.jpg

610 ms

carton-texture.jpg

carton-texture.jpg

638 ms

face-cream.jpg

face-cream.jpg

624 ms

shutterstock_570933538.jpg

shutterstock_570933538.jpg

620 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

css2

css2

50 ms

a1285ecc7f203b584bd41653d1749a4548c09ddf.jpg

a1285ecc7f203b584bd41653d1749a4548c09ddf.jpg

462 ms

aef2177a4cf5e811d339028af4dbf8fbc480a535.jpg

aef2177a4cf5e811d339028af4dbf8fbc480a535.jpg

379 ms

2d46e8dff6d77127e26182fe6ba226389a8bf214.jpg

2d46e8dff6d77127e26182fe6ba226389a8bf214.jpg

643 ms

font

font

50 ms

font

font

74 ms

2044808.js

2044808.js

143 ms

fb.js

fb.js

72 ms

feedbackweb-new.js

feedbackweb-new.js

134 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

142 ms

2044808.js

2044808.js

134 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

77 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

94 ms

c5f8e2e3c6145343f8f1d6870dcd1233eefc6592.jpg

c5f8e2e3c6145343f8f1d6870dcd1233eefc6592.jpg

400 ms

0002d67b5befa7869bc6f954ab4f7e8219862483.jpg

0002d67b5befa7869bc6f954ab4f7e8219862483.jpg

431 ms

2b3055442fa11717cc86e9d7ef4f168738feed98.jpg

2b3055442fa11717cc86e9d7ef4f168738feed98.jpg

450 ms

ee626ea567317fbb24dcc49b36a296dad673bfde.jpg

ee626ea567317fbb24dcc49b36a296dad673bfde.jpg

588 ms

8edb0240a2c6789b3fd07556b1d426cb72a75cda.jpg

8edb0240a2c6789b3fd07556b1d426cb72a75cda.jpg

772 ms

css

css

18 ms

player.css

player.css

592 ms

player.js

player.js

876 ms

1da67cd201bbbad247d6fe8e7b81457753ba072a.jpg

1da67cd201bbbad247d6fe8e7b81457753ba072a.jpg

627 ms

bea852e373fbe68c70e792eb2481a495caffc624.jpg

bea852e373fbe68c70e792eb2481a495caffc624.jpg

663 ms

575809d6511f327d243b33821e7827dac8e0c162.jpg

575809d6511f327d243b33821e7827dac8e0c162.jpg

711 ms

b0f3c92930b23f596605f81b0e1215d8f93a6509.jpg

b0f3c92930b23f596605f81b0e1215d8f93a6509.jpg

815 ms

10ea575fbdc8531a4b92742068dba52d856c13e7.jpg

10ea575fbdc8531a4b92742068dba52d856c13e7.jpg

824 ms

Accessibility Review

exilva.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

exilva.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

exilva.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exilva.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exilva.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

exilva.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Exilva. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: