25.1 sec in total
9.9 sec
14.5 sec
751 ms
Visit exixon.com now to see the best up-to-date Exixon content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about exixon.com
At Exixon, you can have business logo design, branding, website, and landing page services under one roof. We have helped startups and ...
Visit exixon.comWe analyzed Exixon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9.9 sec and then it took 15.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
exixon.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value24.2 s
0/100
10%
Value1,700 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.093
91/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
9859 ms
70 ms
211 ms
218 ms
209 ms
Our browser made a total of 158 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (130 requests) were addressed to the original Exixon.com, 11% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Exixon.com.
Page size can be reduced by 405.8 kB (33%)
1.2 MB
837.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Exixon.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 526.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 398.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 398.7 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 537 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Exixon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exixon.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 122 (92%)
132
10
The browser has sent 132 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exixon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 84 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 40 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
exixon.com
9859 ms
js
70 ms
formidableforms.css
211 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
218 ms
general.min.css
209 ms
eael-6.css
213 ms
swiper.min.css
225 ms
post-8.css
336 ms
global.css
402 ms
post-6.css
418 ms
css
36 ms
all.css
202 ms
bootstrap.min.css
489 ms
style.css
398 ms
woo-mini-cart.min.css
401 ms
all.min.css
633 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
575 ms
style.min.css
678 ms
frontend.min.css
579 ms
woocommerce.min.css
687 ms
woo-star-font.min.css
664 ms
woo-quick-view.min.css
754 ms
text-animations.min.css
756 ms
frontend.min.css
991 ms
all.min.css
861 ms
widgets.css
871 ms
css
45 ms
jquery.min.js
964 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
928 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
960 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1034 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1045 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1130 ms
script.js
1144 ms
underscore.min.js
1141 ms
wp-util.min.js
1167 ms
add-to-cart-variation.min.js
1391 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
1391 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
1393 ms
5efk8ckvxu1j7ayh4ootgh8j912o14hz
214 ms
email-decode.min.js
996 ms
wc-blocks.css
1245 ms
eael-3269.css
1195 ms
post-3269.css
1194 ms
post-3338.css
1187 ms
eael-2804.css
1185 ms
post-2804.css
1470 ms
v4-shims.min.css
1080 ms
css2
13 ms
post-3859.css
1293 ms
post-3867.css
1296 ms
post-3120.css
1290 ms
eael-3258.css
1274 ms
post-3258.css
1202 ms
photoswipe.min.css
1456 ms
default-skin.min.css
1393 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
1390 ms
order-attribution.min.js
1364 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1342 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1336 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1443 ms
react.min.js
1405 ms
hooks.min.js
1298 ms
deprecated.min.js
1299 ms
dom.min.js
1234 ms
react-dom.min.js
1346 ms
escape-html.min.js
1286 ms
element.min.js
1307 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
1302 ms
i18n.min.js
1291 ms
keycodes.min.js
1225 ms
priority-queue.min.js
1282 ms
compose.min.js
1330 ms
private-apis.min.js
1354 ms
redux-routine.min.js
1113 ms
data.min.js
1117 ms
lodash.min.js
1229 ms
wc-blocks-registry.js
1198 ms
url.min.js
1260 ms
api-fetch.min.js
1196 ms
wc-settings.js
1271 ms
data-controls.min.js
1284 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
420 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff
481 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
421 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff
485 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
483 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1g.woff
485 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
483 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1g.woff
486 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
482 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff
486 ms
font
483 ms
font
487 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
486 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1g.woff
488 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
486 ms
font
488 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
488 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedA.woff
488 ms
html-entities.min.js
1360 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
285 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
563 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
565 ms
notices.min.js
1350 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
1114 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
1235 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1151 ms
a11y.min.js
1158 ms
primitives.min.js
1155 ms
warning.min.js
1058 ms
blocks-components.js
1127 ms
blocks-checkout.js
1017 ms
order-attribution-blocks.min.js
991 ms
general.min.js
991 ms
particles.js
961 ms
jarallax.min.js
954 ms
parallax.min.js
1031 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
950 ms
theme.min.js
1054 ms
drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js
1046 ms
drop-down-search.min.js
1016 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
960 ms
ow-lightbox.min.js
962 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
1026 ms
ow-slider.min.js
1054 ms
scroll-effect.min.js
1082 ms
scroll-top.min.js
932 ms
select.min.js
965 ms
woo-custom-features.min.js
888 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
948 ms
woo-quick-view.min.js
955 ms
woo-mini-cart.min.js
980 ms
eael-2804.js
1061 ms
v4-shims.min.js
956 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
962 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
977 ms
waypoints.min.js
977 ms
core.min.js
923 ms
frontend.min.js
976 ms
frontend.min.js
1121 ms
modal-popups.min.js
1019 ms
jquery.zoom.min.js
969 ms
photoswipe.min.js
980 ms
photoswipe-ui-default.min.js
896 ms
single-product.min.js
1002 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1058 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
1197 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1214 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
1419 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1262 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
1359 ms
exixonlogo.png
985 ms
1-1.png
970 ms
3.png
1063 ms
2.png
1061 ms
4.png
800 ms
byzliwoeckk7vxv7yfn1cwac1rpdpwye.js
197 ms
exixon.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
exixon.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
exixon.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exixon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exixon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exixon.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Exixon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: