Access exomonitor.com. Exomonitor - Website and external systems monitoring.

73

Performance

Renders faster than
83% of other websites
92

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 80% of websites
92

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
81% of websites
100

SEO

Google-friendlier than
95% of websites

First Response

63 ms

Resources Loaded

739 ms

Page Rendered

369 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Exomonitor content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about exomonitor.com

Get alerts about low website uptime and performance, outage email, any changes to DNS records and domain registrar, SSL certificate soon expired, and more.

Visit exomonitor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Exomonitor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

93/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.055

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

www.exomonitor.com

63 ms

css2

45 ms

bootstrap.min.css

50 ms

homepage-before-fold.css

58 ms

landing-pages.css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Exomonitor.com, 63% (40 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (180 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Content Size

117.8 kB

After Optimization

69.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Exomonitor.com main page is 117.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 70.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 48.3 kB

Original 70.3 kB
After minification 70.3 kB
After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 76 B

Original 47.5 kB
After minification 47.5 kB
After compression 47.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exomonitor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exomonitor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Exomonitor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

exomonitor.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Exomonitor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Exomonitor - Website and external systems monitoring.

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)