Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

expectantheart.org

Expectant Heart Pregnancy Resource Center

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

811 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

316 ms

expectantheart.org screenshot

About Website

Visit expectantheart.org now to see the best up-to-date Expectant Heart content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about expectantheart.org

Website for Expectant Heart Pregnancy Resource Center

Visit expectantheart.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Expectantheart.org page load time and found that the first response time was 811 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

expectantheart.org performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.259

48/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

expectantheart.org

811 ms

jquery-3.6.3.min.js

83 ms

jquery-migrate-1.4.1.min.js

65 ms

jquery-ui.js

208 ms

jquery-ui.css

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Expectantheart.org, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (811 ms) belongs to the original domain Expectantheart.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 181.3 kB (8%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Expectantheart.org main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 15.6 kB
  • After minification 15.1 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 28.3 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Expectant Heart images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 118.3 kB

  • Original 343.6 kB
  • After minification 343.6 kB
  • After compression 225.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.3 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 208.7 kB
  • After minification 208.7 kB
  • After compression 186.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Expectantheart.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (59%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Expectant Heart. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

expectantheart.org accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

expectantheart.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

expectantheart.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Expectantheart.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Expectantheart.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Expectant Heart. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: