Access expectantheart.org. Expectant Heart Pregnancy Resource Center

Report Summary

About Website

Visit expectantheart.org now to see the best up-to-date Expectant Heart content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about expectantheart.org

Website for Expectant Heart Pregnancy Resource Center

Visit expectantheart.org

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.259

48/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

expectantheart.org

811 ms

jquery-3.6.3.min.js

83 ms

jquery-migrate-1.4.1.min.js

65 ms

jquery-ui.js

208 ms

jquery-ui.css

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Expectantheart.org, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (811 ms) belongs to the original domain Expectantheart.org.

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Expectantheart.org main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

Original 15.6 kB
After minification 15.1 kB
After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 28.3 kB

Original 1.6 MB
After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Expectant Heart images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 127.7 kB

Original 353.0 kB
After minification 352.7 kB
After compression 225.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 127.7 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

Original 208.7 kB
After minification 208.7 kB
After compression 186.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Expectantheart.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Expectant Heart. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Expectantheart.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Expectantheart.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

expectantheart.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Expectant Heart. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Expectant Heart Pregnancy Resource Center

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)