Tools & Wizards About Us
experiencedetailing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

experiencedetailing.com

The Best Ceramic Coatings and Detailing Services in Laguna Hills, CA

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

110 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

experiencedetailing.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to experiencedetailing.com homepage info - get ready to check Experience Detailing best content right away, or after learning these important things about experiencedetailing.com

Being a certified ceramic coating and PPF installer AND a full auto detailer, you can contact Xtreme Xcellence Detailing at (714) 472-3001 to get started today!

Visit experiencedetailing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Experiencedetailing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 110 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

experiencedetailing.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value570 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

experiencedetailing.com

110 ms

experiencedetailing.com

299 ms

rokbox-style.css

37 ms

css-be443dbbbc5972dbfec5403ee86d6694.php

38 ms

css-6bbbe1e12ade756f3ae854ac09e7a311.php

94 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Experiencedetailing.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (430 ms) relates to the external source Ss.sharethis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 99.5 kB (5%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Experiencedetailing.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 70.4 kB

  • Original 83.9 kB
  • After minification 63.7 kB
  • After compression 13.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.2 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 24.0 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Experience Detailing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 203.7 kB
  • After minification 203.2 kB
  • After compression 199.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 529 B

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Experiencedetailing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 529 B or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (44%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Experience Detailing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

experiencedetailing.com

experiencedetailing.com

110 ms

experiencedetailing.com

experiencedetailing.com

299 ms

rokbox-style.css

rokbox-style.css

37 ms

css-be443dbbbc5972dbfec5403ee86d6694.php

css-be443dbbbc5972dbfec5403ee86d6694.php

38 ms

css-6bbbe1e12ade756f3ae854ac09e7a311.php

css-6bbbe1e12ade756f3ae854ac09e7a311.php

94 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

26 ms

default.css

default.css

35 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

89 ms

core.js

core.js

89 ms

caption.js

caption.js

88 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

240 ms

rokbox.js

rokbox.js

240 ms

rokbox-config.js

rokbox-config.js

378 ms

gantry-totop.js

gantry-totop.js

377 ms

gantry-buildspans.js

gantry-buildspans.js

377 ms

gantry-inputs.js

gantry-inputs.js

384 ms

load-transition.js

load-transition.js

384 ms

fusion.js

fusion.js

388 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

390 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.min.js

jquery.nivo.slider.min.js

388 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

376 ms

loader.js

loader.js

430 ms

ga.js

ga.js

87 ms

mainlogo.png

mainlogo.png

168 ms

gp1.png

gp1.png

155 ms

yp.png

yp.png

151 ms

fb.png

fb.png

152 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

170 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

168 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

164 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

162 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

167 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

187 ms

airforce.jpg

airforce.jpg

169 ms

moreinfo.png

moreinfo.png

187 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

168 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

188 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

186 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

186 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

188 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

188 ms

book.png

book.png

198 ms

bookleft.jpg

bookleft.jpg

189 ms

eco.jpg

eco.jpg

196 ms

fabric.jpg

fabric.jpg

198 ms

2010_lexus_sema.jpg

2010_lexus_sema.jpg

201 ms

newportlogo.png

newportlogo.png

187 ms

decals.png

decals.png

201 ms

greenamerica.png

greenamerica.png

200 ms

all.js

all.js

145 ms

diagonal.png

diagonal.png

203 ms

headerbg.png

headerbg.png

186 ms

nav-overlay.png

nav-overlay.png

199 ms

mod-gradient.png

mod-gradient.png

188 ms

nav-lines.png

nav-lines.png

189 ms

menu-shadow.png

menu-shadow.png

187 ms

menu-separator.png

menu-separator.png

190 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

191 ms

logo.png

logo.png

196 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

203 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

81 ms

novecentowide-normal-webfont.woff

novecentowide-normal-webfont.woff

82 ms

body-overlay.png

body-overlay.png

75 ms

noise.png

noise.png

71 ms

cord-divisor-pattern.png

cord-divisor-pattern.png

71 ms

footerline.png

footerline.png

69 ms

novecentowide-demibold-webfont.woff

novecentowide-demibold-webfont.woff

209 ms

all.js

all.js

205 ms

totop.png

totop.png

200 ms

collect

collect

277 ms

53 ms

Accessibility Review

experiencedetailing.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

experiencedetailing.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

experiencedetailing.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Experiencedetailing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Experiencedetailing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

experiencedetailing.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Experience Detailing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: