3.4 sec in total
276 ms
2.2 sec
885 ms
Welcome to exportmaster.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Export Master best content right away, or after learning these important things about exportmaster.co.uk
Our export management software will improve documentation accuracy, ensuring your products get there on time and without delay. Click now...
Visit exportmaster.co.ukWe analyzed Exportmaster.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 276 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
exportmaster.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value13.1 s
0/100
25%
Value11.1 s
6/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
276 ms
412 ms
55 ms
89 ms
175 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Exportmaster.co.uk, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (978 ms) belongs to the original domain Exportmaster.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (54%)
4.9 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Exportmaster.co.uk main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.6 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Export Master needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.6 MB or 58% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 23.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exportmaster.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.0 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (62%)
68
26
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Export Master. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
exportmaster.co.uk
276 ms
exportmaster.co.uk
412 ms
script.js
55 ms
style.min.css
89 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
175 ms
grid-system.css
233 ms
style.css
318 ms
element-clients.css
235 ms
owl-carousel.css
242 ms
caroufredsel.css
237 ms
css
43 ms
responsive.css
257 ms
flickity.css
311 ms
skin-material.css
325 ms
menu-dynamic.css
328 ms
js_composer.min.css
328 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
340 ms
style.css
389 ms
css
99 ms
jquery.min.js
400 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
418 ms
61f041573073c2fd397e78355d551024.js
621 ms
js
98 ms
1871.js
128 ms
style-non-critical.css
491 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
490 ms
core.css
491 ms
simple-dropdown.css
492 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
492 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
492 ms
priority.js
493 ms
intersection-observer.min.js
493 ms
transit.min.js
616 ms
waypoints.js
618 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
619 ms
hoverintent.min.js
620 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
831 ms
touchswipe.min.js
620 ms
caroufredsel.min.js
621 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
747 ms
anime.min.js
747 ms
flickity.min.js
830 ms
superfish.js
830 ms
init.js
880 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
747 ms
exportmaster-logo.gif
408 ms
exportmaster-container-dock-worker.jpg
562 ms
time-icon.png
466 ms
accuracy-icon.png
465 ms
competitive-advantage-icon.png
467 ms
confidwnce-icon.png
467 ms
Kimia-logo.gif
492 ms
Cambridge-Weight-Plan-logo.gif
553 ms
elta-fans-wide.jpg
645 ms
Meadow-logo.gif
552 ms
Marrose-bevel-Col-logo-Horizontal.png
568 ms
Tunnocks-logo.gif
565 ms
tn-logo.png
799 ms
EV-Horizontal-Main-Logo.jpg
968 ms
quote-marks.png
576 ms
quote-marks-red.png
583 ms
Warehouse-forklift.jpg
660 ms
exportmasters-logo.png
654 ms
BASDA-LOGO-MED-RES.png
663 ms
ioe_logo.png
978 ms
Conatiners-dockyard-graphic.jpg
686 ms
Conatiners-dockyard-home-mobile.jpg
618 ms
Graphic-identifier.png
620 ms
s.js
320 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjg.woff
44 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjg.woff
58 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjg.woff
58 ms
icomoon.woff
449 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
487 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
81 ms
exportmaster.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
exportmaster.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
exportmaster.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exportmaster.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exportmaster.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exportmaster.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Export Master. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: