Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

extension.ws

extension.ws

Page Load Speed

544 ms in total

First Response

177 ms

Resources Loaded

242 ms

Page Rendered

125 ms

extension.ws screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Extension content for Mexico. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about extension.ws

Visit extension.ws

Key Findings

We analyzed Extension.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 367 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

extension.ws performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

extension.ws

177 ms

splash.gif

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Extension.ws and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (177 ms) belongs to the original domain Extension.ws.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 177 B (45%)

Content Size

390 B

After Optimization

213 B

In fact, the total size of Extension.ws main page is 390 B. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 390 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 177 B

  • Original 390 B
  • After minification 372 B
  • After compression 213 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 177 B or 45% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Extension. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

SEO Factors

extension.ws SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Extension.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Extension.ws main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Extension. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: