Tools & Wizards About Us
externes-laufwerk-test.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

externes-laufwerk-test.de

Externes Laufwerk Test 2023 ▷ die besten Laufwerke im Vergleich

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

334 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

188 ms

externes-laufwerk-test.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Externes Laufwerk Test content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about externes-laufwerk-test.de

lII➤ Externes Laufwerk ✓ die besten externen Laufwerke im Test & Vergleich 2023 ✓ CD, DVD, Bluray, SSD ✓ (Note SEHR GUT)

Visit externes-laufwerk-test.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Externes-laufwerk-test.de page load time and found that the first response time was 334 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

externes-laufwerk-test.de performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

externes-laufwerk-test.de

334 ms

www.externes-laufwerk-test.de

636 ms

47715ed2b440808856effba2112c5563.css

355 ms

js

34 ms

lazyload.min.js

236 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Externes-laufwerk-test.de, 5% (1 request) were made to Static.getclicky.com and 5% (1 request) were made to In.getclicky.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (696 ms) belongs to the original domain Externes-laufwerk-test.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 61.3 kB (45%)

Content Size

135.0 kB

After Optimization

73.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Externes-laufwerk-test.de main page is 135.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 68.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 54.4 kB

  • Original 68.2 kB
  • After minification 66.9 kB
  • After compression 13.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 66.6 kB
  • After minification 59.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Externes Laufwerk Test images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 135 B
  • After minification 135 B
  • After compression 116 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19 B or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (18%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Externes Laufwerk Test. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

externes-laufwerk-test.de

externes-laufwerk-test.de

334 ms

www.externes-laufwerk-test.de

www.externes-laufwerk-test.de

636 ms

47715ed2b440808856effba2112c5563.css

47715ed2b440808856effba2112c5563.css

355 ms

js

js

34 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

236 ms

99d2ca72acc97e12ff85808dd6b19a5b.js

99d2ca72acc97e12ff85808dd6b19a5b.js

680 ms

externe-laufwerke-logo.png

externe-laufwerke-logo.png

115 ms

externe-laufwerke-logo-gross.png

externe-laufwerke-logo-gross.png

111 ms

heroshot.jpg

heroshot.jpg

223 ms

externer-bluray-brenner-300x300.jpeg

externer-bluray-brenner-300x300.jpeg

233 ms

stripes.png

stripes.png

346 ms

dotted.png

dotted.png

332 ms

sony-logo-300x300.png

sony-logo-300x300.png

352 ms

dell-logo-300x300.png

dell-logo-300x300.png

355 ms

samsung-logo-300x300.png

samsung-logo-300x300.png

357 ms

hp-logo-300x300.png

hp-logo-300x300.png

554 ms

arrow4.png

arrow4.png

457 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

672 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

577 ms

forkawesome-webfont.woff

forkawesome-webfont.woff

696 ms

in.php

in.php

100 ms

retina.css

retina.css

124 ms

Accessibility Review

externes-laufwerk-test.de accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

externes-laufwerk-test.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

externes-laufwerk-test.de SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Externes-laufwerk-test.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Externes-laufwerk-test.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

externes-laufwerk-test.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Externes Laufwerk Test. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: