Tools & Wizards About Us
extrastorage.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

extrastorage.org

Storage Units Medicine Hat and Redcliff | Extra Storage

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

827 ms

Page Rendered

321 ms

extrastorage.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to extrastorage.org homepage info - get ready to check Extra Storage best content right away, or after learning these important things about extrastorage.org

Extra Storage offers a quick and easy means of storage units in Medicine Hat. ... find the right size of the unit(s), and book online right here from our site! ... hours a day, 7 days a week Email: in...

Visit extrastorage.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Extrastorage.org page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

extrastorage.org performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,250 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.extrastorage.org

49 ms

www.extrastorage.org

386 ms

gtm.js

94 ms

css2

78 ms

5989.bae2f158.js

103 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Extrastorage.org, 19% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 15% (4 requests) were made to Assets.website.storedge.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (388 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (28%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Extrastorage.org main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 633.8 kB

  • Original 753.3 kB
  • After minification 753.2 kB
  • After compression 119.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 633.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 336.1 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Extra Storage needs image optimization as it can save up to 336.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 46.2 kB

  • Original 404.7 kB
  • After minification 404.7 kB
  • After compression 358.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (44%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Extra Storage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.extrastorage.org

www.extrastorage.org

49 ms

www.extrastorage.org

www.extrastorage.org

386 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

94 ms

css2

css2

78 ms

5989.bae2f158.js

5989.bae2f158.js

103 ms

main.3ab79f9f.js

main.3ab79f9f.js

103 ms

extrastorage-logo-01.png

extrastorage-logo-01.png

156 ms

embed

embed

234 ms

embed

embed

388 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

83 ms

storable-logo.svg

storable-logo.svg

66 ms

screen-shot-2021-01-26-at-11-47-08-am.png

screen-shot-2021-01-26-at-11-47-08-am.png

166 ms

screen-shot-2021-01-26-at-12-05-56-pm.png

screen-shot-2021-01-26-at-12-05-56-pm.png

167 ms

screen-shot-2021-01-26-at-12-07-45-pm.png

screen-shot-2021-01-26-at-12-07-45-pm.png

176 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-Y3tco5q6.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-Y3tco5q6.ttf

28 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-Y3tco5q6.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-Y3tco5q6.ttf

34 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-Y3tco5q6.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-Y3tco5q6.ttf

39 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-Y3tco5q6.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-Y3tco5q6.ttf

41 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-Y3tco5q6.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-Y3tco5q6.ttf

38 ms

voyager-icons.c457cfef.ttf

voyager-icons.c457cfef.ttf

10 ms

js

js

66 ms

js

js

41 ms

search.js

search.js

4 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

6 ms

main.js

main.js

10 ms

Accessibility Review

extrastorage.org accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

extrastorage.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

extrastorage.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Extrastorage.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Extrastorage.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

extrastorage.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Extra Storage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: