Tools & Wizards About Us
exxonfx.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

exxonfx.com

exxonfx.com - This website is for sale! - exxonfx Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

352 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

257 ms

exxonfx.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to exxonfx.com homepage info - get ready to check Exxonfx best content for Italy right away, or after learning these important things about exxonfx.com

This website is for sale! exxonfx.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, exxonfx.com has it...

Visit exxonfx.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Exxonfx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 352 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

exxonfx.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,330 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.143

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

exxonfx.com

352 ms

exxonfx.com

1898 ms

px.js

80 ms

px.js

81 ms

min.js

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Exxonfx.com, 58% (7 requests) were made to I3.cdn-image.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Pxlgnpgecom-a.akamaihd.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Exxonfx.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.9 kB (45%)

Content Size

15.4 kB

After Optimization

8.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Exxonfx.com main page is 15.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 9.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 970 B

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 926 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 408 B, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 970 B or 51% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 284 B

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Exxonfx images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 9.1 kB
  • After minification 9.1 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 62% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (27%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exxonfx. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

exxonfx.com

exxonfx.com

352 ms

exxonfx.com

exxonfx.com

1898 ms

px.js

px.js

80 ms

px.js

px.js

81 ms

min.js

min.js

36 ms

bg.gif

bg.gif

44 ms

h_bg.gif

h_bg.gif

24 ms

logo.png

logo.png

24 ms

srch-bg.gif

srch-bg.gif

25 ms

lhs.gif

lhs.gif

24 ms

rhs.gif

rhs.gif

39 ms

browserfp.min.js

browserfp.min.js

50 ms

Accessibility Review

exxonfx.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

exxonfx.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

exxonfx.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exxonfx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Exxonfx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

exxonfx.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Exxonfx. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: