1.7 sec in total
91 ms
1.6 sec
56 ms
Welcome to eyecandyproducts.net homepage info - get ready to check Eye Candy Products best content right away, or after learning these important things about eyecandyproducts.net
Visit eyecandyproducts.netWe analyzed Eyecandyproducts.net page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
eyecandyproducts.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value19.2 s
0/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value1,470 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value17.8 s
4/100
10%
91 ms
40 ms
42 ms
41 ms
548 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eyecandyproducts.net, 37% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (831 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 825.1 kB (45%)
1.8 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Eyecandyproducts.net main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 852.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 694.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 694.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eye Candy Products images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 97.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.2 kB or 30% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (46%)
24
13
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eye Candy Products. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.eyecandyproducts.net
91 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
40 ms
minified.js
42 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
41 ms
polyfill.min.js
548 ms
thunderbolt-commons.eb770ee8.bundle.min.js
69 ms
main.578f27a3.bundle.min.js
69 ms
lodash.min.js
68 ms
react.production.min.js
69 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
74 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
70 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
75 ms
c16db7_4301bea136bc4085a963e079c2b81bac~mv2.png
356 ms
c16db7_0e0f6e7b30da43e29e84cbf1b4ab275b~mv2.jpeg
634 ms
c16db7_653f4b9b1704461faebcbd615aab0314~mv2.png
734 ms
c16db7_41d2f38601e54b39b9073038da419b65~mv2.png
664 ms
c16db7_9dc11f4065434e9993ea3cb6d047580b~mv2.jpeg
553 ms
c16db7_56654bde6bf14361b078a19f92e2a87b~mv2.jpeg
564 ms
c16db7_b6809c4e86df4046be8e430338d86731~mv2.jpeg
573 ms
c16db7_48dc000be6de4b5c908c4050d67f8ca9~mv2.jpeg
831 ms
bundle.min.js
79 ms
388ef902-2c31-4818-abb1-a40dcd81f6d6.woff
52 ms
156 ms
143 ms
144 ms
144 ms
139 ms
139 ms
184 ms
179 ms
176 ms
171 ms
172 ms
174 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
9 ms
bolt-performance
21 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
8 ms
right-arrow.svg
6 ms
eyecandyproducts.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
eyecandyproducts.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
eyecandyproducts.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyecandyproducts.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eyecandyproducts.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eyecandyproducts.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eye Candy Products. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: