2.3 sec in total
36 ms
2.1 sec
112 ms
Visit eyeconadvertising.com now to see the best up-to-date Eyeconadvertising content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eyeconadvertising.com
Visit eyeconadvertising.comWe analyzed Eyeconadvertising.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
eyeconadvertising.com performance score
36 ms
1672 ms
50 ms
71 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eyeconadvertising.com, 81% (46 requests) were made to Thomasmediapowerups.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Thomasmediapowerups.com.
Page size can be reduced by 206.5 kB (32%)
650.1 kB
443.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Eyeconadvertising.com main page is 650.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 239.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 131.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 131.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eyeconadvertising needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 54.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 54.0 kB or 23% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 961 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eyeconadvertising.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (88%)
48
6
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eyeconadvertising. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eyeconadvertising.com
36 ms
thomasmediapowerups.com
1672 ms
dashicons.min.css
50 ms
extra.min.css
71 ms
style-main-new.min.css
73 ms
style.min.css
71 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
74 ms
frontend.min.css
101 ms
swiper.min.css
75 ms
post-10.css
94 ms
frontend.min.css
155 ms
style.min.css
99 ms
all.min.css
124 ms
v4-shims.min.css
107 ms
global.css
120 ms
post-63.css
125 ms
post-779.css
125 ms
post-701.css
127 ms
css
30 ms
style.min.css
126 ms
css
48 ms
fontawesome.min.css
130 ms
solid.min.css
128 ms
brands.min.css
132 ms
jquery.min.js
149 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
157 ms
v4-shims.min.js
160 ms
track.js
158 ms
frontend.js
161 ms
script.js
160 ms
scripts.min.js
194 ms
common.js
182 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
182 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
183 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
184 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
185 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
212 ms
hooks.min.js
206 ms
i18n.min.js
210 ms
frontend.min.js
210 ms
waypoints.min.js
186 ms
core.min.js
176 ms
frontend.min.js
210 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
190 ms
widget.css
146 ms
widget.js
46 ms
ThomasMediaPowerUps-Logo.png
59 ms
homepage-bg-1327x642-person-holding-credit-card-on-laptop.jpg
57 ms
Logo-whitebg-large.png
57 ms
Logo-whitebg-large-ovumnbwiqirl65vfd4pre37kmammvqfl0z6rn768lk.png
56 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
17 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
22 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
28 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff
30 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
36 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQXKMny.woff
36 ms
eyeconadvertising.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyeconadvertising.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eyeconadvertising.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eyeconadvertising.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eyeconadvertising. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: