Tools & Wizards About Us
eyepole.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

eyepole.com

Tactical Surveillance Pole Camera, Video & Swat Pole Camera – EyePole by EyeOn

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

100 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

214 ms

eyepole.com screenshot

About Website

Visit eyepole.com now to see the best up-to-date Eye Pole content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eyepole.com

With this tactical telescoping surveillance camera tool you will be able to safely peer into the darkest,most dangerous and most remote places in your operating environment.

Visit eyepole.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Eyepole.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eyepole.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,160 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.161

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eyepole.com

100 ms

index.php

2173 ms

eyepole.com

474 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

50 ms

style.min.css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Eyepole.com, 16% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Labs.ezmarketingtech.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Eyepole.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (39%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eyepole.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 65.8 kB

  • Original 80.2 kB
  • After minification 77.2 kB
  • After compression 14.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eye Pole images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 450.2 kB

  • Original 646.7 kB
  • After minification 636.3 kB
  • After compression 196.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 450.2 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 609.5 kB

  • Original 702.5 kB
  • After minification 657.1 kB
  • After compression 93.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eyepole.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 609.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (76%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eye Pole. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eyepole.com

eyepole.com

100 ms

index.php

index.php

2173 ms

eyepole.com

eyepole.com

474 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

50 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

83 ms

styles.css

styles.css

48 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

50 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

61 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

63 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

100 ms

post-14.css

post-14.css

64 ms

post-113.css

post-113.css

125 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

86 ms

post-121.css

post-121.css

109 ms

post-126.css

post-126.css

74 ms

style.css

style.css

103 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

36 ms

cherry-handler-styles.min.css

cherry-handler-styles.min.css

94 ms

jet-widgets.css

jet-widgets.css

122 ms

jet-widgets-skin.css

jet-widgets-skin.css

107 ms

juxtapose.css

juxtapose.css

113 ms

css

css

45 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

113 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

120 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

120 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

125 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

129 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

151 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

45 ms

js

js

69 ms

cherry-js-core.min.js

cherry-js-core.min.js

136 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

137 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

137 ms

index.js

index.js

137 ms

polyfills.js

polyfills.js

137 ms

primary-navigation.js

primary-navigation.js

315 ms

responsive-embeds.js

responsive-embeds.js

144 ms

cherry-handler.min.js

cherry-handler.min.js

146 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

147 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

314 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

315 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

317 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

312 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

272 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

274 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

270 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

261 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

259 ms

jet-widgets.js

jet-widgets.js

277 ms

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

265 ms

Eyepol-Banner-Revised.jpg

Eyepol-Banner-Revised.jpg

266 ms

eyeon-final-logo123.png

eyeon-final-logo123.png

68 ms

Component-1-%E2%80%93-1.png

Component-1-%E2%80%93-1.png

68 ms

hall.jpg

hall.jpg

69 ms

Screenshot_179.png

Screenshot_179.png

68 ms

udc.jpg

udc.jpg

70 ms

swat2.jpg

swat2.jpg

134 ms

bg3.jpg

bg3.jpg

107 ms

army2.jpg

army2.jpg

164 ms

footer-bg.jpg

footer-bg.jpg

135 ms

ntoa-logo.png

ntoa-logo.png

104 ms

Banner-Eyeon.jpg

Banner-Eyeon.jpg

163 ms

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcABrE.ttf

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcABrE.ttf

51 ms

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk338xcABrE.ttf

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk338xcABrE.ttf

69 ms

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3M8tcABrE.ttf

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3M8tcABrE.ttf

84 ms

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcABrE.ttf

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcABrE.ttf

83 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

84 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

83 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

83 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

81 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

110 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

111 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

109 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

84 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

110 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

112 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

158 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

137 ms

Banner-Eyeon.jpg

Banner-Eyeon.jpg

97 ms

print.css

print.css

14 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

1980 ms

Accessibility Review

eyepole.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

eyepole.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

eyepole.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyepole.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eyepole.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eyepole.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eye Pole. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: