Tools & Wizards About Us
eyeporter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

eyeporter.com

Porter Ophthalmology – Raleigh’s most trusted ophthalmologist for LASIK, SMILE, PRK, RLE, and CATARACT SURGERY

Page Load Speed

395 ms in total

First Response

118 ms

Resources Loaded

186 ms

Page Rendered

91 ms

eyeporter.com screenshot

About Website

Visit eyeporter.com now to see the best up-to-date Eye Porter content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eyeporter.com

Visit eyeporter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Eyeporter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 118 ms and then it took 277 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Eyeporter.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

eyeporter.com performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.319

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eyeporter.com

118 ms

css

39 ms

font

17 ms

font

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eyeporter.com, 50% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 25% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (118 ms) belongs to the original domain Eyeporter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 500.8 kB (58%)

Content Size

862.2 kB

After Optimization

361.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eyeporter.com main page is 862.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 423.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 65.6 kB

  • Original 80.7 kB
  • After minification 79.7 kB
  • After compression 15.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 84.7 kB
  • After minification 79.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eye Porter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 95.9 kB

  • Original 273.2 kB
  • After minification 273.2 kB
  • After compression 177.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 95.9 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 334.2 kB

  • Original 423.7 kB
  • After minification 423.3 kB
  • After compression 89.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eyeporter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 334.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • AJAX
  • CSS

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eye Porter. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

eyeporter.com

eyeporter.com

118 ms

css

css

39 ms

font

font

17 ms

font

font

21 ms

Accessibility Review

eyeporter.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

eyeporter.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

eyeporter.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyeporter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eyeporter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eyeporter.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eye Porter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: