Tools & Wizards About Us
eyespysecurity.im screenshot

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

eyespysecurity.im

Services | Eye-Spy Security IOM

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

271 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

94 ms

eyespysecurity.im screenshot

About Website

Welcome to eyespysecurity.im homepage info - get ready to check Eye Spy Security best content right away, or after learning these important things about eyespysecurity.im

Eye-Spy Security was the first specialist Access Control and CCTV security organisation in the Isle of Man and from this early start we have developed a first class reputation in identifying and imple...

Visit eyespysecurity.im

Key Findings

We analyzed Eyespysecurity.im page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eyespysecurity.im performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eyespysecurity.im

271 ms

eyespysecurity.im

322 ms

bootstrap.min.css

156 ms

mdb.min.css

310 ms

global.min.css

234 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Eyespysecurity.im, 69% (35 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (557 ms) belongs to the original domain Eyespysecurity.im.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 69.3 kB (22%)

Content Size

309.6 kB

After Optimization

240.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eyespysecurity.im main page is 309.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 203.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 8.3 kB
  • After minification 6.7 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 61.1 kB
  • After minification 44.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eye Spy Security needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 36.3 kB

  • Original 203.2 kB
  • After minification 203.2 kB
  • After compression 166.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 37.0 kB
  • After minification 37.0 kB
  • After compression 26.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eyespysecurity.im needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (71%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eye Spy Security. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eyespysecurity.im

eyespysecurity.im

271 ms

eyespysecurity.im

eyespysecurity.im

322 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

156 ms

mdb.min.css

mdb.min.css

310 ms

global.min.css

global.min.css

234 ms

nav.css

nav.css

232 ms

css

css

34 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

235 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

234 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

557 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

395 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

341 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

396 ms

mdb.min.js

mdb.min.js

397 ms

logo.png

logo.png

396 ms

ssaib-2023.png

ssaib-2023.png

465 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

23 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

26 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

27 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

26 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

27 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

27 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu72xMKTU1Kvnz.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu72xMKTU1Kvnz.woff

28 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

30 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-AMP6lbBP.woff

30 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

29 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

30 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff

30 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fABc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fABc-AMP6lbBP.woff

40 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff

41 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

42 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-AMP6lbBP.woff

41 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

42 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

43 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff

42 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fABc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fABc-AMP6lbBP.woff

43 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff

43 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

45 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-AMP6lbBP.woff

45 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

44 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

45 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff

43 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc-AMP6lbBP.woff

44 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff

45 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

47 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-AMP6lbBP.woff

46 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

47 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

47 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff

45 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfABc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfABc-AMP6lbBP.woff

48 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff

47 ms

Accessibility Review

eyespysecurity.im accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

eyespysecurity.im best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

eyespysecurity.im SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyespysecurity.im can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Eyespysecurity.im main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

eyespysecurity.im

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eye Spy Security. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: