Tools & Wizards About Us
ezcapper.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

ezcapper.com

E-ZCapper - Home Page - Sports Handicapping Web Sites as low as $59.99 a Month! - Total Turnkey Custom Website - Track and Sell your Sports Picks/Play...

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

151 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

114 ms

ezcapper.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ezcapper.com homepage info - get ready to check E ZCapper best content right away, or after learning these important things about ezcapper.com

E-ZCapper - Home Page - Sports Handicapping Web Sites as low as $44.99 a Month! - Total Turnkey Custom Website - Track and Sell your Sports Picks/Plays - Start your own sports handicapping service web...

Visit ezcapper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ezcapper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 151 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ezcapper.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,910 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.076

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ezcapper.com

151 ms

mainSiteDemoButton_Elite.jpg

109 ms

adminControlPanelDemoButton_Elite.jpg

109 ms

background.jpg

66 ms

pixel_20.gif

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Ezcapper.com, 14% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (351 ms) relates to the external source Salesiq.zohopublic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.3 kB (7%)

Content Size

364.0 kB

After Optimization

339.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ezcapper.com main page is 364.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 156.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 21.7 kB

  • Original 26.4 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.5 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 230 B

  • Original 122.1 kB
  • After minification 121.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E ZCapper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 156.9 kB
  • After minification 156.9 kB
  • After compression 154.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 58.6 kB
  • After minification 58.6 kB
  • After compression 58.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ezcapper.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (47%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E ZCapper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ezcapper.com

ezcapper.com

151 ms

mainSiteDemoButton_Elite.jpg

mainSiteDemoButton_Elite.jpg

109 ms

adminControlPanelDemoButton_Elite.jpg

adminControlPanelDemoButton_Elite.jpg

109 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

66 ms

pixel_20.gif

pixel_20.gif

65 ms

1x1.jpg

1x1.jpg

65 ms

1x2.jpg

1x2.jpg

67 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

111 ms

divider.gif

divider.gif

66 ms

arrow-list.gif

arrow-list.gif

111 ms

dark1.jpg

dark1.jpg

85 ms

darkBack.jpg

darkBack.jpg

85 ms

lg-share-en.gif

lg-share-en.gif

20 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

19 ms

counter.js

counter.js

27 ms

sportsbook.jpg

sportsbook.jpg

111 ms

promo.jpg

promo.jpg

112 ms

leagueLogos.jpg

leagueLogos.jpg

115 ms

1x3.jpg

1x3.jpg

115 ms

twitter_btn.jpg

twitter_btn.jpg

110 ms

t.php

t.php

140 ms

ga.js

ga.js

11 ms

7_921wuD-vI

7_921wuD-vI

114 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

8 ms

widgetscript

widgetscript

21 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

7 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

26 ms

base.js

base.js

50 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

156 ms

embed.js

embed.js

30 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

29 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

34 ms

Create

Create

21 ms

id

id

13 ms

float.ls

float.ls

351 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

15 ms

Accessibility Review

ezcapper.com accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

ezcapper.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ezcapper.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ezcapper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ezcapper.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ezcapper.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E ZCapper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: