Tools & Wizards About Us
ezedim.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

ezedim.com

Search Engine Optimization is the tool to Grow and Explode your Business

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

142 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

420 ms

ezedim.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ezedim.com now to see the best up-to-date Ezedim content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ezedim.com

Search Engine Optimization uses the latest tools of Google ranking to analyse your website. Our SEO experts will check what your competitions websites are doing compared to your websites and social me...

Visit ezedim.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ezedim.com page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ezedim.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ezedim.com

142 ms

ezedim.com

486 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

60 ms

156-layout.css

122 ms

style.css

230 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Ezedim.com, 19% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (486 ms) belongs to the original domain Ezedim.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 27.9 kB (3%)

Content Size

921.2 kB

After Optimization

893.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ezedim.com main page is 921.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 783.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 32.5 kB
  • After minification 31.5 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 421 B

  • Original 783.9 kB
  • After minification 783.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ezedim images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 162 B

  • Original 69.3 kB
  • After minification 69.3 kB
  • After compression 69.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 35.5 kB
  • After minification 35.5 kB
  • After compression 32.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ezedim.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (60%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ezedim. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ezedim.com

ezedim.com

142 ms

ezedim.com

ezedim.com

486 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

60 ms

156-layout.css

156-layout.css

122 ms

style.css

style.css

230 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

177 ms

css

css

33 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

234 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

171 ms

js

js

61 ms

156-layout.js

156-layout.js

174 ms

navigation.min.js

navigation.min.js

181 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

301 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

301 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

75 ms

hero.jpg

hero.jpg

334 ms

home-1.jpg

home-1.jpg

278 ms

home-2.jpg

home-2.jpg

115 ms

home-3.jpg

home-3.jpg

224 ms

ezedim-tagged-logo.jpg

ezedim-tagged-logo.jpg

70 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

36 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

36 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

45 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtU.woff

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtU.woff

46 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtU.woff

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtU.woff

45 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

js

js

47 ms

Accessibility Review

ezedim.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

ezedim.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ezedim.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ezedim.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ezedim.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ezedim.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ezedim. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: