2.1 sec in total
156 ms
1.7 sec
261 ms
Welcome to ezeep.com homepage info - get ready to check Ezeep best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ezeep.com
Save hundreds of dollars per user every year, ditch print servers and printer drivers while minimizing risk to networks and printers.
Visit ezeep.comWe analyzed Ezeep.com page load time and found that the first response time was 156 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
ezeep.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.098
90/100
15%
Value10.0 s
26/100
10%
156 ms
165 ms
355 ms
279 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Ezeep.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (661 ms) belongs to the original domain Ezeep.com.
Page size can be reduced by 143.7 kB (35%)
415.4 kB
271.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ezeep.com main page is 415.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 243.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ezeep needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.9 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 37.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.7 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 56.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ezeep.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (26%)
39
29
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ezeep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ezeep.com
156 ms
www.ezeep.com
165 ms
www.ezeep.com
355 ms
rzg4yrv.js
279 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
82 ms
styles.css
162 ms
ezeep.min.css
302 ms
jquery.min.js
70 ms
jquery.cookie.js
229 ms
browser-redirect.js
229 ms
jquery.form.min.js
232 ms
scripts.js
230 ms
ezeep.min.js
238 ms
jquery.unveil.min.js
305 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
218 ms
www.ezeep.com
31 ms
logo-ezeep.png
438 ms
cloud-divider-front.png
433 ms
product.png
445 ms
logo-bird.png
434 ms
benefit-front-cloud.png
444 ms
benefit-front-control.png
444 ms
benefit-front-smart.png
443 ms
benefit-front-secure.png
444 ms
oliver-and-jonathan-650x5192-150x150.jpg
442 ms
FotoDavidPe%C3%B1a-1-e1397558234656-150x150.jpg
528 ms
D3X3294-150x150.jpg
513 ms
logo-mit.png
525 ms
logo-betahaus.png
521 ms
logo-thecloud.png
519 ms
logo-ga.png
523 ms
logo-theyard.png
586 ms
logo-mob.png
588 ms
logo-theport.png
593 ms
logo-centraal.png
593 ms
icon-features.png
594 ms
icon-stories.png
596 ms
icon-help.png
661 ms
list-bird.png
661 ms
analytics.js
402 ms
2hhbDQEBcWx1z9YfDGURW64Y8SFX95BSyueLRzCEowMffOALgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
49 ms
oJ_mQbQsBHMWu87wR9IdxjWUNw6GtycE_DejsuQqv7CffOpLgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mj.woff
76 ms
fHfYfGO0w6DzROzEujnb9a-6VIUtRC3JFtxIUChADYMffJVbMUMWeMJ6Mk6f5M9.woff
103 ms
cLL67R0h99hLCxa6nWvmA8CUT0yxzYGpbOcs3ue8GNXffO-LgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mt.woff
121 ms
collect
11 ms
p.gif
126 ms
ezeep.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ezeep.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ezeep.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ezeep.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ezeep.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ezeep.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ezeep. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: