7 sec in total
461 ms
6.1 sec
441 ms
Visit ezeeshipping.in now to see the best up-to-date Ezeeshipping content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ezeeshipping.in
Cloud ERP product that streamlines the management of freight forwarders, NVOCCs, customs brokers, trucking companies, warehouses & container freight stations.
Visit ezeeshipping.inWe analyzed Ezeeshipping.in page load time and found that the first response time was 461 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ezeeshipping.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.7 s
0/100
10%
Value62.9 s
0/100
25%
Value24.4 s
0/100
10%
Value7,120 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.1
89/100
15%
Value40.5 s
0/100
10%
461 ms
942 ms
93 ms
1361 ms
470 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ezeeshipping.in, 63% (54 requests) were made to Ezeeshipping.com and 13% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Ezeeshipping.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (43%)
3.4 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Ezeeshipping.in main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.5 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ezeeshipping images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 904.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 904.8 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 482.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ezeeshipping.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 482.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (68%)
69
22
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ezeeshipping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ezeeshipping.in
461 ms
ezeeshipping.com
942 ms
js
93 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1361 ms
icons.css
470 ms
fontawesome-all.css
700 ms
font-awesome.min.css
704 ms
icomoon.css
705 ms
plugins.css
1157 ms
animate.css
698 ms
owl.carousel.css
927 ms
rev-settings.css
929 ms
styles.css
1395 ms
element.js
81 ms
js
74 ms
analytics.js
24 ms
js
53 ms
demo.jpg
725 ms
logo.png
949 ms
banner1.jpg
1178 ms
banner2.jpg
958 ms
banner3.jpg
1612 ms
banner4.jpg
1830 ms
banner5.jpg
2087 ms
banner6.jpg
1576 ms
collect
14 ms
angular.min.js
1396 ms
angular-resource.js
1173 ms
jquery.min.js
1406 ms
plugins.js
2040 ms
Chart.bundle.js
1854 ms
utils.js
1632 ms
navigation.js
1637 ms
navigation.fixed.js
1848 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1866 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1872 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
2078 ms
revolution.extension.carousel.min.js
2083 ms
revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js
2098 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
2109 ms
revolution.extension.migration.min.js
2111 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
2264 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
2306 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
2311 ms
revolution.extension.video.min.js
2320 ms
map.js
2100 ms
main.js
2101 ms
app.js
2245 ms
loading_spinner.gif
2288 ms
navigation.css
1604 ms
default.css
1626 ms
css
26 ms
css
37 ms
css
41 ms
o2_VGM-e-C8
543 ms
freight-forwarder.jpg
542 ms
customs-clearance.jpg
540 ms
transportation.jpg
542 ms
warehouse.jpg
539 ms
include-contact-us.html
471 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
449 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
450 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
531 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
621 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
575 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
620 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
544 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
574 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
575 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
622 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
888 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
888 ms
icomoona8d0.ttf
1027 ms
www-player.css
133 ms
www-embed-player.js
182 ms
base.js
248 ms
include-footer.html
578 ms
widget
1484 ms
ad_status.js
196 ms
6mt_jkCC8QEMfVv4UaXe0WVRezbgElH9_VSMBGBwk28.js
133 ms
embed.js
46 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
27 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
27 ms
id
25 ms
Create
132 ms
GenerateIT
13 ms
ezeeshipping.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ezeeshipping.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ezeeshipping.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ezeeshipping.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ezeeshipping.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ezeeshipping.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ezeeshipping. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: