2.2 sec in total
285 ms
1.7 sec
232 ms
Welcome to ezepc.in homepage info - get ready to check EZEPC best content right away, or after learning these important things about ezepc.in
Designed by W3Designs
Visit ezepc.inWe analyzed Ezepc.in page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
ezepc.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value200 ms
89/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
285 ms
397 ms
28 ms
96 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Ezepc.in, 13% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (564 ms) belongs to the original domain Ezepc.in.
Page size can be reduced by 107.3 kB (12%)
868.5 kB
761.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Ezepc.in main page is 868.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 709.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.4 kB, which is 58% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, EZEPC needs image optimization as it can save up to 80.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ezepc.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (69%)
29
9
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EZEPC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ezepc.in
285 ms
ezepc.in
397 ms
css
28 ms
animate.css
96 ms
icomoon.css
190 ms
bootstrap.css
378 ms
magnific-popup.css
283 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
284 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
293 ms
style.css
295 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
376 ms
jquery.min.js
473 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
463 ms
bootstrap.min.js
464 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
464 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
471 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
486 ms
jquery.countTo.js
487 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
489 ms
magnific-popup-options.js
493 ms
main.js
564 ms
loader.gif
239 ms
banner.jpg
426 ms
Slide2.PNG
361 ms
conference_room3.png
558 ms
retail.jpg
364 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBi8Jow.ttf
28 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8Jow.ttf
35 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K3vXBi8Jow.ttf
40 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K67QBi8Jow.ttf
41 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nQBi8Jow.ttf
43 ms
icomoon.ttf
472 ms
icomoon.ttf
382 ms
widget
432 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
31 ms
js
57 ms
ezepc.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
ezepc.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ezepc.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ezepc.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ezepc.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ezepc.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EZEPC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: