7.7 sec in total
2.6 sec
4 sec
1.1 sec
Welcome to ezranking.in homepage info - get ready to check Ezranking best content right away, or after learning these important things about ezranking.in
Ezranking is award-wining Digital marketing company in haridwar. It is best seo company in haridwar Uttarakhand.
Visit ezranking.inWe analyzed Ezranking.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
ezranking.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value5.5 s
18/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value320 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.05
99/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
2582 ms
201 ms
193 ms
207 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Ezranking.in, 4% (3 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Scontent-iad3-2.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ezranking.in.
Page size can be reduced by 508.6 kB (36%)
1.4 MB
918.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Ezranking.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 900.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 329.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ezranking needs image optimization as it can save up to 329.7 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 97.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ezranking.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 97.1 kB or 49% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (65%)
68
24
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ezranking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ezranking.in
2582 ms
style.min.css
201 ms
2-layout.css
193 ms
mainstyles.css
207 ms
fontello.css
208 ms
ea-style.css
206 ms
jquery-ui.css
209 ms
modal-min.css
289 ms
sfsi-style.css
308 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
301 ms
font-awesome.min.css
316 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
304 ms
wp-carousel-free-public.min.css
306 ms
css
22 ms
bootstrap.css
483 ms
flaticon.css
399 ms
style.css
400 ms
all.min.css
402 ms
v4-shims.min.css
408 ms
animate.css
415 ms
jquery.min.js
601 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
499 ms
custom.js
500 ms
bootstrap.js
507 ms
quick-call-button.css
418 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
491 ms
2-layout.js
510 ms
app.js
511 ms
core.min.js
648 ms
accordion.min.js
648 ms
frontend.js
648 ms
jquery-ui.js
823 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
649 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
649 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
649 ms
random-shuffle-min.js
649 ms
custom.js
727 ms
fancybox.min.js
728 ms
fancybox-config.min.js
630 ms
preloader.min.js
620 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
801 ms
wp-carousel-free-public.min.js
693 ms
collapse.min.js
697 ms
script.js
700 ms
drag-quick-call-button.js
622 ms
cropped-logo-ezranking.png
357 ms
affordable-seo-services.jpg
456 ms
PPC-Campaign-Strategy.jpg
375 ms
5b1d2b9069d7c_thumb900.jpg
377 ms
web-development-.png
377 ms
logo_icon_vector_286594.jpg
478 ms
web-disign.png
732 ms
wer.png
562 ms
seoez-300x191.jpg
476 ms
spinner.svg
477 ms
01jB86usVUQ0i3SEicQ9ogU-21.fit_scale.size_1028x578.v_1569480883.jpg
559 ms
05KpzEBwxbTONoHz2Zo1xZg-15.fit_scale.size_1028x578.v_1569481534.jpg
566 ms
majestic_logo_large.jpg
675 ms
ubbersugest.png
672 ms
lsi.png
761 ms
whatsapp-logo-32x32.png
663 ms
default
262 ms
post.php
383 ms
font
68 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
763 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
665 ms
Flaticon.svg
695 ms
Flaticon.woff
694 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
731 ms
fontello.woff
762 ms
sdk.js
780 ms
RMTS_NlHvkE.js
37 ms
301927415_474170098056058_6127158672498752561_n.jpg
161 ms
67447719_732694707150598_1999399265897545728_n.jpg
330 ms
-RBTFFfbsYr.png
25 ms
L0hsXTmQDMQ.png
28 ms
ezranking.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
ezranking.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ezranking.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ezranking.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ezranking.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ezranking.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ezranking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: