Tools & Wizards About Us
ezscreensolutions.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

ezscreensolutions.com

Employment Background Screening Company | Employee Background Check Process

Page Load Speed

21 sec in total

First Response

61 ms

Resources Loaded

20.2 sec

Page Rendered

708 ms

ezscreensolutions.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ezscreensolutions content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ezscreensolutions.com

EZ Screen Solutions is a full-service pre-employment background screening company offering industry leading software making the process easy & accurate.

Visit ezscreensolutions.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ezscreensolutions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 21 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

ezscreensolutions.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,970 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.261

47/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.5 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ezscreensolutions.com

61 ms

ezscreensolutions.com

54 ms

css

68 ms

leaflet.css

41 ms

mappress.css

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Ezscreensolutions.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Ezscreensolutions.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 164.0 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ezscreensolutions.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 561.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 97.4 kB

  • Original 117.4 kB
  • After minification 99.0 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 561.7 kB
  • After minification 556.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ezscreensolutions images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 35.3 kB

  • Original 531.5 kB
  • After minification 531.5 kB
  • After compression 496.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 25.9 kB

  • Original 128.7 kB
  • After minification 128.6 kB
  • After compression 102.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ezscreensolutions.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.9 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (84%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ezscreensolutions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ezscreensolutions.com

ezscreensolutions.com

61 ms

ezscreensolutions.com

ezscreensolutions.com

54 ms

css

css

68 ms

leaflet.css

leaflet.css

41 ms

mappress.css

mappress.css

43 ms

styles.css

styles.css

43 ms

style.css

style.css

51 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

71 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

79 ms

style.css

style.css

75 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

81 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

62 ms

eael-729.css

eael-729.css

83 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

85 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

89 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

126 ms

animate.css

animate.css

110 ms

sliders.min.css

sliders.min.css

103 ms

icomoon.css

icomoon.css

98 ms

lae-frontend.css

lae-frontend.css

100 ms

lae-grid.css

lae-grid.css

114 ms

lae-widgets.min.css

lae-widgets.min.css

128 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

126 ms

post-729.css

post-729.css

122 ms

mediaelementplayer.min.css

mediaelementplayer.min.css

137 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

138 ms

slidedeck.css

slidedeck.css

140 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

138 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

162 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

159 ms

modernizr.full.min.js

modernizr.full.min.js

161 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

188 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

187 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

202 ms

slidedeck.jquery.js

slidedeck.jquery.js

185 ms

slidedeck-public.js

slidedeck-public.js

205 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

56 ms

t.js

t.js

58 ms

js

js

89 ms

css

css

69 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

201 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

200 ms

api.js

api.js

80 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

155 ms

widget-divider.min.css

widget-divider.min.css

237 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

211 ms

widget-video.min.css

widget-video.min.css

263 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

263 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

256 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

31 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

244 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

231 ms

index.js

index.js

232 ms

index.js

index.js

224 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

224 ms

new-tab.js

new-tab.js

224 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

224 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

19 ms

index.js

index.js

219 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

208 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

206 ms

lae-frontend.min.js

lae-frontend.min.js

203 ms

lae-carousel-helper.min.js

lae-carousel-helper.min.js

202 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

190 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

190 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

180 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

238 ms

testimonials-slider.min.js

testimonials-slider.min.js

287 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

93 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

105 ms

main-banner.jpg

main-banner.jpg

19908 ms

blue-seal-200-65-bbb-90256670.png

blue-seal-200-65-bbb-90256670.png

275 ms

PBSA_FullName-Color_transparent.png

PBSA_FullName-Color_transparent.png

184 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

132 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

179 ms

logo.png

logo.png

131 ms

y7.jpg

y7.jpg

258 ms

icon-1.png

icon-1.png

182 ms

icon-5.png

icon-5.png

182 ms

icon-2.png

icon-2.png

181 ms

icon-4.png

icon-4.png

272 ms

icon-3.png

icon-3.png

272 ms

agreement-business-clapping.jpg

agreement-business-clapping.jpg

273 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

192 ms

font

font

114 ms

lae-icomoon.ttf

lae-icomoon.ttf

95 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

119 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

46 ms

lae-icomoon.woff

lae-icomoon.woff

133 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

20 ms

Accessibility Review

ezscreensolutions.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ezscreensolutions.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ezscreensolutions.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ezscreensolutions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ezscreensolutions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ezscreensolutions.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ezscreensolutions. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: