Tools & Wizards About Us
fence.ecer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

fence.ecer.com

Ecer - China Factories Video Meeting

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

579 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

fence.ecer.com screenshot

About Website

Visit fence.ecer.com now to see the best up-to-date Fence Ecer content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fence.ecer.com

Find quality products from China, online meetings with China factories, manufacturers, ECER Meeting help you face to face with China factories

Visit fence.ecer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fence.ecer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 579 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fence.ecer.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,400 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fence.ecer.com

579 ms

www.ecer.com

206 ms

newEcer.css

165 ms

iconfont.css

167 ms

js

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Fence.ecer.com, 53% (21 requests) were made to Img.ecerimg.com and 23% (9 requests) were made to Img1.ecerimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (579 ms) belongs to the original domain Fence.ecer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 673.1 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

838.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fence.ecer.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 932.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 426.0 kB

  • Original 500.9 kB
  • After minification 359.6 kB
  • After compression 74.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 141.3 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 426.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 197.2 kB

  • Original 932.6 kB
  • After minification 735.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fence Ecer needs image optimization as it can save up to 197.2 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 17.5 kB
  • After minification 17.5 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 47.9 kB

  • Original 60.8 kB
  • After minification 60.2 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fence.ecer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

34

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fence Ecer. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

fence.ecer.com

fence.ecer.com

579 ms

www.ecer.com

www.ecer.com

206 ms

newEcer.css

newEcer.css

165 ms

iconfont.css

iconfont.css

167 ms

js

js

60 ms

webim_corp.js

webim_corp.js

182 ms

20240219_65d3625956e0a.mp4.jpg

20240219_65d3625956e0a.mp4.jpg

173 ms

preview.webp

preview.webp

437 ms

20240223_65d87cc2691ab.mp4_w240xh180.jpg

20240223_65d87cc2691ab.mp4_w240xh180.jpg

137 ms

20240301_65e142277f6a6.mp4_w240xh180.jpg

20240301_65e142277f6a6.mp4_w240xh180.jpg

139 ms

20240301_65e16bf3450b4.mp4.jpg

20240301_65e16bf3450b4.mp4.jpg

140 ms

20231225_6588f0819b19c.mp4_w240xh180.jpg

20231225_6588f0819b19c.mp4_w240xh180.jpg

143 ms

20240305_65e6ccfd16ce6.mov_w240xh180.jpg

20240305_65e6ccfd16ce6.mov_w240xh180.jpg

143 ms

20240307_65e9129e85f01.mp4_w240xh180.jpg

20240307_65e9129e85f01.mp4_w240xh180.jpg

143 ms

20240308_65eae5c207886.mp4_w240xh180.jpg

20240308_65eae5c207886.mp4_w240xh180.jpg

144 ms

20240312_65f0002e86bce.mp4_w240xh180.jpg

20240312_65f0002e86bce.mp4_w240xh180.jpg

143 ms

preview.webp

preview.webp

443 ms

preview.webp

preview.webp

388 ms

preview.webp

preview.webp

448 ms

preview.webp

preview.webp

428 ms

preview.webp

preview.webp

438 ms

preview.webp

preview.webp

465 ms

ecer.com.png

ecer.com.png

134 ms

liveSprite.png

liveSprite.png

134 ms

ecv_p_pro_logo.png

ecv_p_pro_logo.png

138 ms

ecv_p_pro.jpeg

ecv_p_pro.jpeg

140 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

136 ms

ecv_p_cate_logo.png

ecv_p_cate_logo.png

139 ms

location_.png

location_.png

138 ms

liveSprite.png

liveSprite.png

145 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

143 ms

analysis.png

analysis.png

147 ms

deviceiios.png

deviceiios.png

144 ms

deviceapps.png

deviceapps.png

146 ms

ecer.sprite.unicode.png

ecer.sprite.unicode.png

144 ms

okimg.png

okimg.png

145 ms

GoogleSans-Regular.ttf

GoogleSans-Regular.ttf

147 ms

Roboto-Regular.ttf

Roboto-Regular.ttf

54 ms

iconfont.woff

iconfont.woff

54 ms

iconfont.woff

iconfont.woff

114 ms

Accessibility Review

fence.ecer.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

fence.ecer.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fence.ecer.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fence.ecer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fence.ecer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fence.ecer.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fence Ecer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: