Tools & Wizards About Us
go.edq.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

go.edq.com

Page Load Speed

802 ms in total

First Response

173 ms

Resources Loaded

556 ms

Page Rendered

73 ms

go.edq.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Go Edq content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about go.edq.com

Visit go.edq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Go.edq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 629 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

go.edq.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,050 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

go.edq.com

173 ms

go.edq.com

149 ms

experian.png

49 ms

svrGP

102 ms

svrGP.aspx

95 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Go.edq.com, 50% (3 requests) were made to S2448.t.eloqua.com and 17% (1 request) were made to Experian.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (173 ms) belongs to the original domain Go.edq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 494 B (17%)

Content Size

2.9 kB

After Optimization

2.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Go.edq.com main page is 2.9 kB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 286 B

  • Original 771 B
  • After minification 768 B
  • After compression 485 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 286 B or 37% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 208 B

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Go Edq images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • Images

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Go Edq. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

go.edq.com

go.edq.com

173 ms

go.edq.com

go.edq.com

149 ms

experian.png

experian.png

49 ms

svrGP

svrGP

102 ms

svrGP.aspx

svrGP.aspx

95 ms

tinydot.gif

tinydot.gif

24 ms

Accessibility Review

go.edq.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

go.edq.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

go.edq.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Go.edq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Go.edq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

go.edq.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Go Edq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: